tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5780881198603853530.post8647733346656348921..comments2024-02-08T19:00:06.509+05:30Comments on Aerial View : Panel Discussion: 22 Jul 16Aerial Viewhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17115360943663046368noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5780881198603853530.post-33954459953253477162016-07-27T16:09:08.345+05:302016-07-27T16:09:08.345+05:30@Veterans & @radhey govind,
In 2005 UoI SLP (...@Veterans & @radhey govind,<br /><br />In 2005 UoI SLP (5905 of 2003) against Maj Dhanapalan was dismissed by the Apex Court and he was paid Rank Pay arrears though his BP pay was not increased by the amount of rank pay.<br /><br />In 2012, in UoI vs Lt Col N K Nair and others, the Apex Court agreed with the order in the Maj Dhanapalan case and arrears were paid for deducting rank pay.<br /><br />In Dec 12, Services HQ raised 4 points with MoD - (1) Change as on 1.1.1986 to wef 1.1.1986 as decided in the Court order (2)is the Apex Court order applicable to 5 CPC and 6 CPC, (3) minimum of the integrated pay scale for Capts should be increased by the amount of Rs 200 to Rs 3000, and (4) the maximum of the integrated pay scale for Brigs should be increased by Rs 1200 from Rs 5100 to Rs 6300.<br /><br />The Attorney General's legal opinion was sought on the above points. In Sep 13 he opined (1) yes, the effect should be w.e.f 1.1.1986 and (2) yes, deduction of rank pay, wherever it was paid should be restored i.e 5th CPC. He gave a NO (3) on the increase of the minimum of Capt's pay to Rs 3000, and (4) a No to increasing integrated pay scale from 2300-5100 to 2300-6300.<br /><br />This was accepted by Service HQ but the RDOA challenged it in a Contempt Petition filed before the opinion of the AG was available. <br /><br />In its order, the Apex Court dismissed the Contempt Petition. No Review Petition was filed within the time laid down. Hence the situation rests there. <br /><br />Therefore, it is reasonable to understand that some of us insisting that there should be an increase in the integrated pay scales in 4th CPC, and persisting that our pay in the 5th CPC should be increased by the amount of Rank Pay, and using that as the basis for increases in Grade Pay is not correct. <br /><br />Consequently, holding a position that is incorrect will only add to the agony of ill-feeling and we can shout and do more but to what effect?<br /><br />You may want to pause and ask yourself whether in the acceptance of the OROP if anyone has brought up that OROP should be based on higher Grade pay of Majors to Brigadiers retiring in 2013? If not, why hasn't that been a point in addition to the 5 points (definition, implementation, annual equalisation, automatic increases, and enforcement in perpetuity), been raised in the heated OROP discourse? Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16599233400842278493noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5780881198603853530.post-21263524037313243472016-07-26T22:09:33.141+05:302016-07-26T22:09:33.141+05:30Sir,
Happy to learn the history of justice. The is...Sir,<br />Happy to learn the history of justice. The issues, as learnt are<br />(a) major GP 6600<br />(b) colnels Gp 8700<br />(c) NFU<br />(d) coordinated efforts by defence Forces<br />Simple question? Do we now, atleast, know that some time in past we were equated with IPS?<br />Thanks for clearing doubts, as to stages in level.<br />Hope we understand.<br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02265465571843712340noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5780881198603853530.post-65239898073070126512016-07-26T20:02:48.008+05:302016-07-26T20:02:48.008+05:30You have said "There are higher start (Entry ...You have said "There are higher start (Entry Pay) for all ranks in the Defence Pay Matrix (DPM) as compared to Civil Pay Matrix (CPM)" in the 7th pay commission recommendations!<br /><br />Firstly, are the Maj, Col & Brig supposed to GP 6600, 8700 & 8900? What about Lt.Col? If 6th pay commission anomalies are ignored, your analysis is correct. I feel these observations will negatively impact any decision on rectification of existing anomalies. <br /><br />Veteranshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15616232581971123568noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5780881198603853530.post-2203627841097677752016-07-25T19:58:06.840+05:302016-07-25T19:58:06.840+05:30Sir,
Am I to understand that whoever that officer...Sir,<br /><br />Am I to understand that whoever that officer from APCC was had no comments on your comments on 7 CPC but spoke about 3 CPC of 1970s when he might not have been in service?<br /><br />These are planted disruptive elements. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16599233400842278493noreply@blogger.com