Minutes of meeting
of the Working Group for implementation of
One Rank One
Pension
In order to discuss the modalities
of implementation of One Rank One Pension (OROP), the first meeting of Working
Group constituted as per MoD’s decision dated 24th April 2014 was
held on 2nd May 2014 in the conference hall of CGDA’s office. The
meeting was chaired by CGDA and list of participants are attached as Annx -1.
2. Opening the discussion, CGDA welcomed
the members and intimated the mandate given to the working group as per MoD ID
dated 24th April 2014. CGDA also stated that for implementation of
OROP, the solution be practicable and implementable within the reasonable time
frame.
3. Pr CDA (P) Allahabad made a
presentation amplifying the definition of OROP and key terms used in the same.
Pr Cdr (P) presented two options for consideration of the working group for
implementation of OROP. Copy of presentation made by Pr CDA (P) is attached
herewith. After presenting the options, it was stated that working group may
make a consensus on basic parameters viz. cut-off date, definition of current
& past pensioners, future enhancements etc to finalise the proposal in real
terms. Pr CDA (P) further opined that option I which provides revision of
pension based on arithmetic mean on rates of pension of post-2006 pensioners
having equal qualifying service, is a practicable one and could be expeditiously
implemented by Pension Disbursing agencies in a reasonable time frame.
4. Reps of Services made following points for consideration of
the working group:
(a) Enhancement taken place during service
of a personnel has been averaged down in Option – I.
(b) Cut off date shall be taken as 1.4.2014
and pensioners retired prior to this date shall be treated as past pensioners.
(c) As
future enhacements have to be automatically passed on to the pensioners,
Services proposal for incremental increase in pension on 1st July
every year shall be considered was corrected by hand of Chairman PARC as “proposal for annual revision of OROP tables
should be considered.”
(d) Option projected by the Pr CDA (P) will
just bridge the gap and will not establish OROP.
(e) Benefits
shall also be considered for JCO/OR.
5. After detailed discussion, following points were deliberated
up on:
(i) As
mandate given to the working group is to establish parity in pension,
establishing pay parity is beyond its purview.
(ii) In
his Interim budget speech for the year 2014-15 (attached as Annexure -2),
Hon’ble FM announced that Govt has accepted the principle of OROP for Defence
Forces and thus decide to close the gap in the pension between Pre-2006
retirees and Post-2006 retirees. He also specifically mentioned that as a
result of changes in pension rules applicable to the Defence Forces notified on
three occasions in 2006, 2010 and 2013, the gap between Pre-2006 retirees and
Post-2006 retirees has been closed in ranks of Havildar, Nb Subedar and Subedar
Major. The gap that exists in the ranks of Sepoy, Naik, and in the ranks of
Major & above is now proposed to be bridges by walking “the last mile and
close the gap for all retirees in all ranks.” Based on this an inference is drawn
that Pre-s006 retiree shall be considered as Past Pensioners. Accordingly,
those who have travelled in the regime of 6th CPC and retired
thereafter shall be treated as Current retirees.
(iii) Date of
implementation of new recommendations shall be from 1.4.2014.
(iv) Annual
incremental increase in pension as proposed by the Services would lead to
change in existing pension structure which is not in the domain of working
group and also not practical one. Hence, future enhancements in pension shall
be considered based on recommendations of Seventh Pay Commission
recommendations.
6. CGDA stressed on the need to understand
the key terms used in the definition of OROP provided by MoD through their
minutes of meeting held on 26.2.2014, with greater clarity so as to arrive (at)
the best possible solution. Reps of Services concluded that for better
appreciation of the two options presented by Pr CDA (P) during the meeting,
they need a thorough examination and they will revert on the same. However, it
was suggested to have a formal discussion between reps of Services and reps of
CGDA/Pr CDA (P) to discuss some points of doubts. Keeping in view the time line
given to the working group, CGDA advised to have the discussion the same day
and view of the Services shall be given to the CGDA office positively by 5th
May 2014 to examine the same.
7. Meeting ended with a vote of thanks to the chair.
Appendix –I
Points of discussion
held between Reps of Services and reps of CGDA, PCDA (P) on 2nd May
2014
The discussion was chaired
by PCDA (P) Allahabad
1. Reps of Services intimated that they
have gone through Option-I and raised following points for
consideration/clarification:
(i) Anomaly
in rated for pension for higher qualifying service vis-à-vis lower qualifying service
in same rank shall be considered for removal.
(ii) Anomaly
in rates of pension for higher rank vis-à-vis lower rank in same qualifying
service shall also be considered for removal.
(iii) Methodology may be drawn for arriving at
revised pension where there is no retiree available for any length of
qualifying service.
(iv) Tables for rates of pension shall be
prepared for less than 20/15 years of qualifying service.
(v) Same
tables shall be prepared for Col (TS) & Col (S).
(vi) Qualifying
service shall be rounded off to one year due to change of increment policy in
July each year for serving personnel. It will not make any change in the
financial effect.
2. After detailed discussion, issues at (i) and (ii) above were
agreed to in principle subject to finding out a suitable method for achieving
this. PCDA (P) suggested that further examination will be required to arrive at
any decision for issues as at (iii), (iv)
& (v) above. There was no consensus for the issue as at (vi)
above.
3. Reps pf Services stated that they had
not examined Option-II presented to the working group and their detailed
comment will be provided to CGDA office as early as possible.
Annx-1
List of participants attended first meeting of the
Working Group held on
2.5.2014 for implementation of One Rank One Pension
Reps of CGDA/PCDA (P)
1. Km Vandana Srivastava IDAS CGDA In chair
2. Sh A N Saxena IDAS Addl
CGDA
3. Dr G D Pungle IDAS Or
CDA (P) Allahabad
4. Sh Ajay Mishra IDAS Jt
CGDA
5. Sh C K Bhatjiwale ACGDA
(Pen)
6. Ms B Lakshmi Krishna Sr
Accts Offr (Pen)
7. Sh Awadesh Srivastava AAO
(Pen)
8. Sh Rajesh Kumar Gupta AAO
(Pen)
9. Sh M A Farooqui AAO-
Pr CDA (P) Allahabad
10. Sh Ajay Kumar AAO
– Pr CDA (P) Allahabad
Reps of Ministry
11. Sh B K Mukhopadhyay JS
& Addl FA (M)
12. Sh Navin Choudhary JS
(E)
13. Sh Pradeep Kumar Director
(AG-I)
14. Sh Chanan Ram Saini DS
(Pen)
15. Sh Virendra Kumar DFA
(Pen)
Reps of Services
16. Maj Gen K K Agarwal Chairman
PCC (Army)
17. AVM S M Subhani Chairman
PCC (Air Force)
18. R Adm Pradeep Joshi Chairman
PCC (Navy)
19. Col R K Prusty Director
PCC (Army)
20. Gp Capt S Dagar Member
PCC (Air Force)
21. Gp Capt D S Dagar Member
PCC (Air Force) (?)
Signatures of the Working Group
Presentation of
the CGDA on OROP on 2nd May 2014
Slide 2 Outline
- One Rank One Pension (OROP)
- Key terms used in OROP definition
- Current Pension structure
- Proposal of the Services
- Options Available
- Conclusion
Slide 3 One Rank One
Pension (OROP)
Scope defined in the meeting held on 26.2.2014 chaired by
Hon’ble RM (MoD ID dated 26.2.2014)
“One Rank One Pension (OROP) implies that uniform pension
be paid to the Armed Forces personnel retiring in the same rank with the same
length of service irrespective of the date of their retirement and any future
enhancement in the rates of pension to be automatically passed on to the past
pensioners.
This implies bridging the gap between the rates of
pension of the current pensioners and the past pensioners and also future
enhancements in the rate of pension to be automatically passed on to the past
pensioners.”
Slide 4 Key terms used in OROP definition
- Uniform Pension
- Uniform pension means pension under a uniform pay/pension structure i.e. under the pay scales with the same qualifying service and same pension calculation formula
- Does not mean same (equal) pension to all retirees (past & current)
·
Rank
·
Officers – Rank
held at the time of retirement
·
JCOs/ORs – Rank
with their trades/group last held at the time of retirement
Slide 5 Key terms (contd)
- Length of Service
- Total service qualifying for pension
- Qualitative comparison of length of service in terms of number of years rendered in each rank before retirement
·
Past & Current Pensioners
·
Pensioners
retired during currency of pay commission are on the same structure
·
The date of
implementation of Sixth CPC should be reckoned as a cut off date for the past
& current pensioners
Slide 6 Key terms (contd)
- Future Enhancements
- Pay structure with annual increments relevant for serving personnel
- Method of bringing parity between the past & current retirees should be linked with the pension structure and not the pay structure
Slide 7 Key terms (contd)
- Bridging the gap in Pension
- Ministry has defined to bridge the gap in pension between the rates of pension
- While bridging the gap in pension between pre and post 2006 category for the maximum number of personnel, some variation may persist
Slide 8 Proposal of the Services: An
Analysis
- The various features of the proposal have been examined and grouped into three categories as follows
- Agreeable features/points
- Will disturb Pension structure and needs to be referred to the Pay Commission
- Beyond the purview of the Working Group
Slide 9 Proposal of the Services (contd)
- Points of agreement
- Initial upgradation of pension will be made from 1st April 2014 [Para 9 (a)]
- Linkage of full pension with 33 years of QS shall be removed [Para 9 (b)]
- For Sepoy, Naik & Havildar, the ceiling of 32 years of QS shall be removed [Para 9 (c)]
Slide 10 Proposal of the Services (contd)
- Issues which will disturb Pension Structure and need to be referred to Pay Commission
- Qualifying service be rounded off to the nearest completed year [Para 5]
- Notional pension based on the highest pay, as on 1st July actually drawn (inclusive of annual increment) by each rank with reference to the length of QS shall be allowed to past pensioners [Para 7]
- Definition of OROP does not differentiate between different pay groups/services, highest pay drawn by each rank irrespective of pay groups, shall be taken into account across the three services [Para 8]
Slide 11 Proposal of the Services (contd)
- Issues which will disturb Pension Structure and need to be referred to Pay Commission
- After initial upgradation, pension will be revised on 1st July every year starting from 1st July 2014 [Para 9 (a)]
- If revised pension for a rank at any length of service is less than the pension for the same rank for lower length of service, pension of higher length of service shall be stepped up to the level of lower length of service for that rank [Para 9 (f)]
- If live data is not available for any rank/length of service, pension for the next higher rank for same length of service to be taken reducing the pension by half the amount of difference in Grade pays of the two ranks [Para 9 (k)]
Slide 12 Proposal of the Services (contd)
- Beyond the scope of OROP
- Honorary Nb Sub, MACP Nb Sub & equivalents will be granted the pension of Nb Sub [Para 9 (j)]
- Change/improvements in Hony Lt/Capt shall be applicable to regular commissioned officers in the ranks of Lieutenant & Captain, if it is beneficial [Para 9 (j)]
- Condition for counting of reduced service in the ranks for pre-1986 retiree officers shall be removed in order to pay all retirees with the same criteria [Para 9 (m)]
Slide 13 Proposal of the Services (contd)
- Beyond the scope of OROP
- Pension of current pensioners for all time bound ranks (up to Colonel) to be extended to past pensioners with same length of commissioned service, if the past pensioners had retired before 16th December 2004
- For this purpose, years of service will be relevant and tables for higher rank shall be taken into consideration to determine pension [Para 9 (n)]
- Any changes in the policy regarding pay or promotion which affect the pay/pension of future pensioners shall also be passed on to the past pensioners from the same date [Para 10].
Slide 14 Option Proposed
- For implementation of OROP based on the existing norms viz. Rank, Pay drawn, Qualifying service etc, following two options are proposed
- Option I On the basis of average/mean amount of pension for all current retirees
- Option II On allowing notional increments on minimum of fitment tables for the rank last held
Slide 15 Option I
- Pension differs for the same rank and the same qualifying service due to different pay drawn by each individual
- To neutralise the difference, an average (arithmetic mean) of pension of all current pensioners (post 2006) could be determined and applied to past pensioners
- Protection for post-2006 pension drawing less than the mean shall be required
- Those drawing pension above the mean continue to get the higher amount of pension
Slide 16 Option II
- Service rendered in the rank held last shall be considered
- Minimum of fitment tables for the rank last held to be taken as a benchmark on 1.1.2006
- The increments earned during the service in the last rank held shall be notionally allowed @ 3% over the minimum of fitment tables
- 50% of the amount so fixed could be considered as pension
Slide 17 Comparative Statements
Rank
|
Pension pre-2006
|
Pen range post-2006
|
Option I
|
Option II
|
Major
(QS 22 years)
|
16550
|
19285-22745
|
21484
|
22855
(10 increments)
|
Colonel
(QS 26 years)
|
27795
|
26745-34570
|
31376
|
32620
(10 increments)
|
Brigadier
(QS 33 years
|
29145
|
30475-37985
|
34822
|
33320
(5 increments)
|
Maj Gen
(QS 33 years)
|
30350
|
35410-38500
|
37131
|
36665
(7 increments)
|
Slide 18 Comparative Statements
Rank
|
Pension pre-2006
|
Pen range post-2006
|
Option I
|
Option II
|
Hav Y
QS 24 years
|
7375
|
7005-11000
|
7443
|
7495
(10 increments)
|
Subedar Y
QS 28 years
|
11970
|
10455-14370
|
11971
|
12375
(10 increments
|
Slide 19 Implementation Approach
- Option I
- Implementation is easy and can be implemented through Table based circulars
- Pension across the three services for a particular Qualifying service will be taken into account & mean calculated
- After issue of Government letter and circular thereon, payment is to be made by PDAs
- It can be implemented in short time
Slide 20 Implementation Approach
- Option II
- Notional Pay after allowing the increments in last rank will be required from Pay Accounting Authorities
- Current PDA details would be required
- Corrigendum PPO have to be issued by PSAs based on LPC-cum-Data Sheet
- It is time taking process as more than 18 lakh cases will be involved
Record of
discussion of second meeting of the Working Group for
Implementation of
One Rank One Pension
The second meeting of Working Group
constituted as per MoD’s decision dated 24th April 2014 was held on
8th May 2014 in the conference hall of CGDA’s office. The meeting
was chaired by Addl CGDA and list of participants is attached as Annx-I to this
minutes.
2. Opening the discussion, Addl CGDA
welcome the members of the Working Group and desired the feedback from the
Services on the proposals of Pr CDA (P) presented during the first meeting of
Working Group held on 2nd May 2014.
3. Reps of Services put forth following
points for clarification by members of the working group:
(a) From
where the Terms of Reference of the Working Group have been taken.
(b) The aim is to grant OROP or is one time
increase to bridge the gap.
4. Reps of Services further submitted that
Terms of Reference should be taken from the suggestion/recommendations made in
the Report of Rajya Sabha Committee on Petitions dated 19.12.2011 and
subsequently reiterated in the definition approved by Hon’ble RM and circulated
by Ministry vide their ID dated 26.2.2014. Speech of Hon’ble FM is a reference
point and not Act of Parliament and hence, it should be viewed in that light.
5. Pr CDA (P) stated that the Terms of
Reference for the Working Group has been clearly spelt out by Ministry of
Defence in his order dated 24.2.2014 and there is no need for its further
elucidation. Pr CDA (P) also intimated that the key terms have been taken in
his last presentation held on 2nd May 2014 from the definition of
OROP circulated by MoD vide their ID dated 26.2.2014 read with Interim Budget
Speech 2014-15 of Hon’ble Finance Minister. The later one is considered to
elaborate the key terms which are silent in the definition circulated by MoD ID
dated 26.2.2014.
6. After discussion, it was considered
that the points of disagreements may be recorded and referred to the Ministry.
The points of disagreements, recorded during the meeting is enclosed as Annx-2
to these minutes of meeting.
7. Meeting ended with a vote of thanks to the chair.
List of participants attended first meeting of the
Working Group held on
8.5.2014 for implementation of One Rank One Pension
Reps of CGDA/PCDA (P)
1. Sh A N Saxena IDAS Addl
CGDA in chair
2. Dr G D Pungle IDAS Or
CDA (P) Allahabad
3. Sh Ajay Mishra IDAS Jt
CGDA
4. Sh C K Bhatjiwale ACGDA
(Pen)
5. Ms B Lakshmi Krishna Sr
Accts Offr (Pen)
6. Sh Awadesh Srivastava AAO
(Pen)
7. Sh Rajesh Kumar Gupta AAO
(Pen)
8. Sh M A Farooqui AAO-
Pr CDA (P) Allahabad
9. Sh Ajay Kumar AAO
– Pr CDA (P) Allahabad
Reps of Ministry
10. Sh B K Mukhopadhyay JS
& Addl FA (M)
11. Sh Navin Choudhary JS
(E)
12. Sh Pradeep Kumar Director
(AG-I)
13. Sh Chanan Ram Saini DS
(Pen)
14. Sh Virendra Kumar DFA
(Pen)
Reps of Services
15. Maj Gen K K Agarwal Chairman
PCC (Army)
16. AVM S M Subhani Chairman
PCC (Air Force)
17. R Adm Pradeep Joshi Chairman
PCC (Navy)
18. Capt A T Anandan Dy
Chairman PCC (Navy)
19. Col R K Prusty Director
PCC (Army)
20. Col Jasdeep Singh Director
PCC (Army)
21. Gp Capt S Dagar Member
PCC (Air Force)
22. Gp Capt D S Dagar Member
PCC (Air Force)
23. Cdr V S Chauhan Director
TRIPAS (Army)
24. Cdr Vishal Agarwal Jt
Dir PCC (Navy)
25. Wg Cdr K N Bhatt Member
PCC (Air Force)
26. Lt Cdr A Sudhir Member
PCC (Navy)
Signatures of the Working Group
Annx
Minutes of the
meeting of Working Group on OROP held on 8.5.2014 in the office of CGDA
Points of Differences
1. Definition of OROP
Definition of OROP should be drawn
from the Hon’ble FM Interim Budget 2014-15 speech vide the gap between pre-2006
retirees and post-2006 retires for all ranks needs to be closed.
As per Services, the definition of
OROP is given by the Rajya Sabha Committee on Petitions presented on 19.11.2011
and reiterated by the Hon’ble RM in his directions given in meeting held on
26.2.2014, which states that “One Rank One Pension implies that uniform pension
be paid to the Armed Forces personnel retiring in the same rank with same
length of service, irrespective of their date of retirement and any future
enhancements in the rates of pension to be automatically passed on to the past
pensioners.” Services also feel that essence of the Hon’ble FM speech in
parliament is also the same. However, the details emerge only from the OROP
definition given above which has not cut-off date like 1.1.2006 as brought out
in Para 3 of draft Government letter submitted by the Services. In other words,
in the opinion of Services there is no cut off date like 1.1.2006.
2. Interpretation of the term “Uniform Pension” in the OROP
definition
Uniform pension means pension under
a uniform pay/pension structure i.e. under same pay scales with same qualifying
service & pension calculation formula. It need not necessarily lead to same
pension for all the retiree (past & current) in the same rank and same
qualifying service because of the annual increments given to the serving
personnel.
As per Services, uniform pension
means one (as in the term ‘OROP’) same/equal/identical pension amount for Armed
Forces personnel retiring in the same rank and same length of service i.e.
Qualifying Service (as defined in Pension Regulations for the Army 2008) as per
para 3 of the report of Rajya Sabha Committee on Petitions presented on
19.12.2011. There is no intention of introducing annual increments for
pensioners.
3. Interpretation of the term “Length of Service” in the OROP
definition
The term “Length of Service” in the
OROP definition (i.e. same pension for same rank and length of service) is to
be treated as the number of years of service put in by the pensioner in the
rank last held. Alternatively, if total qualifying service is to be treated for
the purpose of OROP then qualitative aspects relating to length of service in
terms of number of years rendered in each rank in service person has served
before the retirement in the rank last held, need be taken cognisance of. While
this will be difficult to implement in practice, appropriate mechanism which is
workable and implementable, can be worked out to implement the spirit of OROP
so as to bridge the gap in pension of pre & post 2006 pensioners.
Whereas Services feel that length of
service and qualifying service are synonymous and any other interpretation
gives rise to certain anomalies viz. reduction or no benefits in pension on
promotion (one illustration given). Services interpretation is based on Rule 19
of Pension Regulations 2008 as also the precedence of MoD letter No. 1
(11)/2012-D (Pen/Policy) dated 17.1.2013 wherein qualifying service and length
of service are synonymous for determining pension. The alternative
interpretation of “Length of service” being the service only in the rank last
held is not only violative of existing regulations but also near impossible to
implement with existing format of PPOs which only indicate the qualifying
service.
4. Bridging the gap in the pension amount
between current & past pensioner vis-à-vis extending the benefit of changes
of improves service conditions of serving personnel to past pensioners.
It is considered that a method has
to be worked out with a view to bridge the gap in pension amount between pre
& post-2006 pensioners without extending the benefits of improved service
conditions (viz. method of faster promotion applicable to the current
personnel) to past pensioners.
Services view is that OROP is not
only bridging the gap but removing the gap with a view of granting same/equal
pension to all retirees but with same rank and same qualifying service with
future enhancement to be passed to the past pensioners automatically as
enunciated in the definition of OROP. It is also brought out that benefit of
MSP and Grade Pay for calculation of pension has already been extended to past
pensioners vide MoD letter No. 1 (11)/2012-D (Pen/Policy) dated 17.1.2013.
Similarly, other future benefits, if any, should be passed on to the past
pensioners.
5. Modalities for automatically passing of the benefit of
future enhancements in the rate of
pension
As and when there is
enhancement/change in the basic rate of pension (either based on pay commission
recommendation or Government policy) this benefit is to be passed onto the past
pensioners.
The Services endorse the above with
the qualification that there will be a need for periodic review of OROP tables
say on a yearly basis wherein a few anomalies may have emerged (junior drawing
more pension than senior) which will require to be addressed.
Signatures of the Working Group
Record of the
discussion of third meeting of the Working Group for
Implementation of
One Rank One Pension
In order to decide the modalities
for implementation of OROP, the third meeting of Working Group constituted as
per MoD’s decision dated 24th April 2014, was held on 9th
May 2014 in the conference hall of CGDA’s office. The meeting was chaired by
CGDA and the list of participants is attached as Annx-1 to this minutes.
2. Opening the discussion, CGDA welcomes
the members of the Working Group. Addl CGDA briefed on the development taken
place in the last two meetings and sought views of reps of Services on the
average method proposed by the PCDA (P) Allahabad. Reps of the Services stated
that the period of span taken for calculating average is too big (1.1.2006 to
31.03.2014) and the Services felt that the period be restricted to one year
i.e. July 13 to March 14. Reps of Services further reiterated that instead of
taking average pension, maximum value of pension for each Qualifying Service
should be taken for making the OROP tables.
3. Rep of MoD made a point that Maximum of
Fitment table as done in the case of JCOs/ORs can be taken. Reps of Services
were not agreeable on the proposal and stated that rate of pension being drawn
by a current pensioner (viz. post 1.7.2013 retiree) should be allowed to past
pensioners in order to implement OROP in true sense. On the issue of referring
Report of Rajya Sabha Committee of Petition for determining terms of reference,
JS (E) pointed out that there are large number of Parliament Committees whose
findings/recommendations may or may not be accepted by the Government. As such,
Terms of Reference may be derived from the FM speech made in the Parliament or
as per definition provided by RM.
4. Services also put forth a separate
Model of calculation of pension which was a modification to the Model II
presented by the PCDA (P) Allahabad vide his presentation on 2.5.2014. Reps of
Services also agreed that extreme deviations in a rank could be excluded to
avoid undue/unintended benefits across the board.
5. CGDA suggested that Services may
provide a write up on their proposal with assumptions for examination. Addl
CGDA also stated that Pr CDA (P)’s Option-I may also be examined by the
Services by considering mean or mode value in last one year data starting from
1st July 2013 to 31st March 2014. It was agreed upon that
all the methods suggested to the Working Group should be examined with reference
to the live data of three Services.
6. Meeting ended with a vote of thanks to the chair.
List of participants attended third meeting of the
Working Group held on
9.5.2014 for implementation of One Rank One Pension
Reps of CGDA/PCDA (P)
1. Km Vandana Srivastava IDAS CGDA In chair
2. Sh A N Saxena IDAS Addl
CGDA
3. Sh Ajay Mishra IDAS Jt
CGDA
4. Sh C K Bhatjiwale ACGDA
(Pen)
5. Ms B Lakshmi Krishna Sr
Accts Offr (Pen)
6. Sh Awadesh Srivastava AAO
(Pen)
7. Sh Rajesh Kumar Gupta AAO
(Pen)
8. Sh M A Farooqui AAO-
Pr CDA (P) Allahabad
9. Sh Ajay Kumar AAO
– Pr CDA (P) Allahabad
Reps of Ministry
10. Sh B K Mukhopadhyay JS
& Addl FA (M)
11. Sh Navin Choudhary JS
(E)
12. Sh Pradeep Kumar Director
(AG-I)
13. Sh Chanan Ram Saini DS
(Pen)
14. Sh Virendra Kumar DFA
(Pen)
Reps of Services
15. Maj Gen K K Agarwal Chairman
PCC (Army)
16. AVM S M Subhani Chairman
PCC (Air Force)
17. R Adm Pradeep Joshi Chairman
PCC (Navy)
18. Capt A T Anandan O
i/c PCC (Navy)
19. Col R K Prusty Director
PCC (Army)
20. Gp Capt S Dagar Member
PCC (Air Force)
21. Gp Capt D S Dagar Member
PCC (Air Force) (?)
Signatures of the Working Group
Record of the
discussion of fourth meeting of the Working Group for
Implementation of
One Rank One Pension
The fourth meeting of Working Group constituted as per
MoD’s decision dated 24th April 2014, was held on 15th
May 2014 in the conference hall of CGDA’s office. The meeting was chaired by
Addl CGDA and list of participants is attached as Annx-1 to this minutes.
2. Opening the discussion, Addl CGDA
welcomed the members and referred the discussion held on 9th May
2014 in which the Services wanted to examine a revised proposal based on Mean,
Mode and Maximum value (after excluding extreme values) by taking data of last
one year retirees starting 1st July 2013 to 31st March
2014. Addl CGDA stated that the new methods suggested by Services on 12th
May 2014 have been gone through and it is found that both methods have some
reservations as already pointed out on the Services’ initial proposal given to
the working group by Ministry. The main issues highlighted were Annual revision
of pension, allowing maximum pension of post 1.7.2013 retiree, extending
benefits of current promotion/service conditions to the post retirees, current
& past pensioners etc.
3. Reps of Services made following points
for consideration of the working group:
(a) Pension
data for last one year as agreed to in last meeting was yet to be made
available.
(b) Instead
of taking maximum value amongst mean, median and mode, max function should be
taken.
(c) The
values of OROP tables based on maximum pension after removing extreme points
shall approximately be same as proposed by Pr CDA (P) to determine pension on
mean value. For this, different pension tables could be issued for different
entry grades in JCO/OR as well as Officers.
(d) On adopting any other method for
implementation of OROP, pension structure anomalies will continue. If maximum
pension is taken, it will be conforming to the definition of OROP ad would not
generate grievances and litigations by Ex-Servicemen post implementation.
(e) The
data available for the Air Force (all ranks) pensioners retired between
1.7.2013 and 31.3.2014 was made available to the Working Group for working
their proposal across the three Services.
(f) As
far as the issue of annual revision of pension is concerned, the Services
emphasised that there is no intent to upgrade the pensions annually. Only on
annual review of OROP tables is envisaged to take care of any anomalies which
may have crept in. It was also clarified that once steady state is achieved,
there will be no requirement for annual review of OROP tables.
(g) As
far as extending benefits of current promotions/service conditions to the past
retirees is concerned, the Services proposal does not envisage notional
promotion to past retirees for the purpose of OROP.
4. Reps of Ministry also made following points for
consideration of the working group:
(i) Removal
of 33 year conditionality for pre-2006 Defence pension is sub-judice and should
not be considered by the Working Group.
(ii) Post-2006
pensioners could not be equated with current retiree as benefit of OROP has to
be considered only for pre-2006 pensioners.
(iii) As
giving rates of pension maximum or otherwise has to be decided by the Ministry
of Finance, financial implication for all possible proposals should also be
worked out.
5. After detailed discussion, it was decided that Pr CDA (P)
may check the difference in rates of pension by working out revised pension in
mean, median, mode and max function along with financial implication in each
scenario. Pr CDA (P) may also provide data of last one year retirees of Army
pensioners to reps of Services for their analysis.
6.
Meeting ended
with a vote of thanks to the chair.
Annx-1
List of participants attended fourth meeting of the
Working Group held on
15.5.2014 for implementation of One Rank One Pension
Reps of CGDA/PCDA (P)
1. Sh A N Saxena IDAS Addl
CGDA in
chair
2. Sh Ajay Mishra IDAS Jt
CGDA
3. Sh C K Bhatjiwale ACGDA
(Pen)
4. Ms B Lakshmi Krishna Sr
Accts Offr (Pen)
5. Sh Awadesh Srivastava AAO
(Pen)
6. Sh Rajesh Kumar Gupta AAO
(Pen)
Reps of Ministry
7. Sh B K Mukhopadhyay JS
& Addl FA (M)
8. Sh Navin Choudhary JS
(E)
9. Sh Pradeep Kumar Director
(AG-I)
10. Sh Chanan Ram Saini DS
(Pen)
11. Sh Virendra Kumar DFA
(Pen)
Reps of Services
12. Maj Gen K K Agarwal Chairman
PCC (Army)
13. AVM S M Subhani Chairman
PCC (Air Force)
14. R Adm Pradeep Joshi Chairman
PCC (Navy)
15. Capt A T Anandan Dy
Chairman PCC (Navy)
16. Col R K Prusty Director
PCC (Army)
17. Gp Capt S Dagar Member
PCC (Air Force)
18. Gp Capt D S Dagar Member
PCC (Air Force)
19. Wg Cdr K N Bhatt Member
PCC (Air Force)
20. Lt Cdr A Sudhir Member
PCC (Navy)
Signatures of the Working Group
Record of the
discussion of fifth meeting of the Working Group for
Implementation of
One Rank One Pension
In order to decide the modalities
for implementation of OROP, the fifth meeting of Working Group constituted as
per MoD’s decision dated 24th April 2014, was held on 23rd
May 2014 in the conference hall of CGDA’s office. The meeting was chaired by
CGDA and the list of participants is attached as Annx-1 to this minutes.
2. Opening the discussion, CGDA welcome
the members of the Working Group. The minutes of the earlier meetings were
circulated amongst the members of the Working Group. The contents of the
minutes were discussed and finalised during the meeting.
3. Pr CDA (P) Allahabad intimated financial implications on the
following proposals discussed during the previous meetings.
S No
|
Brief detail of proposal
|
Approx financial implications (in crores) per year
|
1
|
Maximum
of the fitment tables for Officers (as followed in the case of JCO/OR)
|
Rs 240
|
2
|
On
allowing notional increments on minimum of fitment tables for ranks last held
|
Rs 520
|
3
|
On
basis of average/mean amount of pension for all post-2006 retirees
|
Rs 550
|
4
|
Proposal
of Services based on maximum pension of current retirees
|
Rs 9100
|
4. Reps of Services reiterated that the
data base available with Pr CDA (P) for post-2006 pensioners and working sheets
for above calculations may be shared with them for analysis. Pr CDA (P)
mentioned that the details of calculation are available in the CGDA’s office
and the reps of Services may take any information desired.
5. Meeting ended with a vote of thanks to the chair.
List of participants attended fourth meeting of the
Working Group held on
23.5.2014 for implementation of One Rank One Pension
Reps of CGDA/PCDA (P)
1. Kum Vandana Srivastava IDAS CGDA In chair
2. Sh G D Pungle IDAS Pr
CDA (P) Allahabad
3. Sh Ajay Mishra IDAS Jt
CGDA
4. Sh C K Bhatjiwale ACGDA
(Pen)
5. Ms B Lakshmi Krishna Sr
Accts Offr (Pen)
6. Sh Awadesh Srivastava AAO
(Pen)
7. Sh Rajesh Kumar Gupta AAO
(Pen)
Reps of Ministry
8. Ms A S Lakshmi JS
(ESW)
9. Sh B K Mukhopadhyay JS
& Addl FA (M)
10. Sh Navin Choudhary JS
(E)
11. Sh Pradeep Kumar Director
(AG-I)
12. Sh Chanan Ram Saini DS
(Pen)
13. Sh Virendra Kumar DFA
(Pen)
14. Sh Ganesh H Nikhare SO
(Fin/Pen)
Reps of Services
15. Maj Gen K K Agarwal Chairman
PCC (Army)
16. AVM S M Subhani Chairman
PCC (Air Force)
17. R Adm Pradeep Joshi Chairman
PCC (Navy)
18. Capt A T Anandan Dy
Chairman PCC (Navy)
19. Col R K Prusty Director
PCC (Army)
20. Gp Capt D S Dagar Member
PCC (Air Force)
21. Cdr Vishal Agarwal Member
PCC (Navy)
22. Lt Cdr A Sudhir Member
PCC (Navy)
Signatures of the Working Group
* * * * *
Sir, I had tried to post this comment previously from another device and can't be certain if it got through.
ReplyDeleteBut, slide 13 of the CGDA presentation resulted in a really huge OROP anomaly when it categorised Services' proposal on OROP for time-bound ranks as being "Beyond the scope of OROP".
It resulted in gaps between what OROP is and what OROP should be, as in this example : bit.ly/2HY12Jb