Thursday 14 June 2018

Published as received from a pseudonymous source - Notional Pay etc: amplified


A pseudonymous writer sent me the following table asking for any comments from readers of my blog.

So, here it is 

Taazakhabar is the pseudonymous writer. In reply to Corona8, he has offered the following amplifications

First Row

First column:   Year is the calendar year and (QS) is qualifying service

Second to Fourth Columns: The figures 1-10 indicates the first 10 officers of the course promoted to the higher rank, and so on

The amounts indicated are based on actual Pay in the Pay Band (PIPB), Grade Pay (GP) and MSP; in suceeding years increments are based on the total of PIPB + GP x 3% and then adding MSP.

Amounts in the 7th CPC are from the Pay matrix based on the two options given by the CPC and approved by the GoI/MoD

Taazakhabar requests to know what happens to OROP as the 7th CPC pensions will be based on 50% of actual Reckonable emoluments as on 31.12.2015, which would vary as per his logic.   

Year (QS)
1-10 (PIPB+GP+MSP)
11-20 (PIPB+GP+MSP)
21-30 (PIPB+GP+MSP)
31-40 (PIPB+GP+MSP)
Rank
Lt Col/Cdr/Wg Cdr
2006 (13)
51400
51400
51400
51400
2007 (14)
52770
52770
52770
52770
2008 (15)
54180
54180
54180
54180
Rank
Col
Lt Col/Cdr/Wg Cdr
Jan 2009 (16)
 57250
55630
55630
55630
Rank
Col/Capt (IN)/Gp Capt
Lt Col/Cdr/Wg Cdr
Jul 2009 (16)
58975
57250
57120
57120
Rank
Colonel/Capt (IN)/Gp Capt
Lt Col
2010 (17)
60740
58975
58975
58660
2011 (18)
62570
60740
60740
60240
2012 (19)
65000
62570
62570
61870
2013 (20)
66400
65000
65000
63550
2014 (21)
68400
66400
Col 66400
65280
Rank
Colonel/Capt (IN)/Gp Capt
2015 (22)
70420
68400
68400
66400
Notional Pay in 6th CPC
70400
68400
68400
66400
Pension @ 50% in 6th CPC
35200
34200
34200
32200
OROP  (22 y)
Protected
Protected
Protected
33320
Index in 7th CPC Pay Matrix (6th CPC x 2.57)
180928
Next higher
186200
175788
Next higher
180800

?

?
Pension @ 2.57 of 7th CPC

93100

90400

?

?
Pension @ 2.67 of 7th CPC

 96722

93917

?

?

Nearly the same clarifications with Reference comment of Corona8 below.

The clarifications of the author, which appear not to have been copy-pasted are:

The figures on the X axis i.e. 1-10 etc are first ten members of the Course etc continuing to 40 course-mates.

The figures in the Y axis in brackets are the number of years of service or Qualifying Service (QS).


The amounts are actually drawn by the pseudonymous author's Course.

Clarification required: Will Notional Pay based pension affect OROP? If so how
  

4 comments:

  1. The table-maker appears to have rushed to his keyboard without caring to clarify his thought-process.

    The table does not bother to clarify what (13), (14), (15) etc
    stand for in the first column. If these are years of service, then what are the figures (1-10), (11-20) etc for in the first header row?

    Are the figures in columns 2, 3, 4 and 5 actual pay drawn or based on some logic only the table-maker understands?

    The impression is this is just an exercise in table-doodling and expecting others to fill in the blanks. The anonymous sender could think of elaborating on what his point is so others can clarify, if at all possible.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sir,

      The figures on the X axis i.e. 1-10 etc are first ten members of the Course etc

      The figures in the Y axis in brackets are the number of years of service or qualifying service aka QS.

      Comparing the figures in the tables in an Excel table of PIPB + GP + 3% increment and then adding MSP appears to indicate actual pay drawn.

      The clarification sought might be whether OROP would remain as an ethereal concept if the Option B of the 7th CPC is implemented i.e pension based on notional pay progression to the Pay matrix.

      Delete
  2. What is the use of referring tables and colums when MOD is in deep slumber.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sir, I am sorry for not having been able to get back to the blog earlier.

    The doubts raised by @TaazaKhabar are genuine and point to the haphazard way in which OROP and VI/VII CPC pensions were fixed.

    The doubts I had raised two and a half years ago remain doubts still. goo.gl/J5guDN

    ReplyDelete