A pseudonymous writer sent me the
following table asking for any comments from readers of my blog.
So, here it is
Taazakhabar is the pseudonymous writer. In reply to Corona8, he has offered the following amplifications
First Row
First column: Year is the calendar year and (QS) is qualifying service
Second to Fourth Columns: The figures 1-10 indicates the first 10 officers of the course promoted to the higher rank, and so on
The amounts indicated are based on actual Pay in the Pay Band (PIPB), Grade Pay (GP) and MSP; in suceeding years increments are based on the total of PIPB + GP x 3% and then adding MSP.
Amounts in the 7th CPC are from the Pay matrix based on the two options given by the CPC and approved by the GoI/MoD
Taazakhabar requests to know what happens to OROP as the 7th CPC pensions will be based on 50% of actual Reckonable emoluments as on 31.12.2015, which would vary as per his logic.
Year (QS)
|
1-10 (PIPB+GP+MSP)
|
11-20 (PIPB+GP+MSP)
|
21-30 (PIPB+GP+MSP)
|
31-40 (PIPB+GP+MSP)
|
Rank
|
Lt Col/Cdr/Wg Cdr
|
|||
2006 (13)
|
51400
|
51400
|
51400
|
51400
|
2007 (14)
|
52770
|
52770
|
52770
|
52770
|
2008 (15)
|
54180
|
54180
|
54180
|
54180
|
Rank
|
Col
|
Lt Col/Cdr/Wg Cdr
|
||
Jan 2009 (16)
|
57250
|
55630
|
55630
|
55630
|
Rank
|
Col/Capt (IN)/Gp Capt
|
Lt Col/Cdr/Wg Cdr
|
||
Jul 2009 (16)
|
58975
|
57250
|
57120
|
57120
|
Rank
|
Colonel/Capt (IN)/Gp Capt
|
Lt Col
|
||
2010 (17)
|
60740
|
58975
|
58975
|
58660
|
2011 (18)
|
62570
|
60740
|
60740
|
60240
|
2012 (19)
|
65000
|
62570
|
62570
|
61870
|
2013 (20)
|
66400
|
65000
|
65000
|
63550
|
2014 (21)
|
68400
|
66400
|
Col 66400
|
65280
|
Rank
|
Colonel/Capt (IN)/Gp Capt
|
|||
2015 (22)
|
70420
|
68400
|
68400
|
66400
|
Notional Pay in 6th
CPC
|
70400
|
68400
|
68400
|
66400
|
Pension @ 50% in 6th
CPC
|
35200
|
34200
|
34200
|
32200
|
OROP (22 y)
|
Protected
|
Protected
|
Protected
|
33320
|
Index in 7th
CPC Pay Matrix (6th CPC x 2.57)
|
180928
Next higher
186200
|
175788
Next higher
180800
|
?
|
?
|
Pension @ 2.57 of 7th
CPC
|
93100
|
90400
|
?
|
?
|
Pension @ 2.67 of 7th
CPC
|
96722
|
93917
|
?
|
?
|
Nearly the same clarifications with Reference comment of Corona8 below.
The clarifications of the author, which appear not to have been copy-pasted are:
The figures on the X axis i.e. 1-10 etc are first ten members of the Course etc continuing to 40 course-mates.
The figures in the Y axis in brackets are the number of years of service or Qualifying Service (QS).
The amounts are actually drawn by the pseudonymous author's Course.
Clarification required: Will Notional Pay based pension affect OROP? If so how
The table-maker appears to have rushed to his keyboard without caring to clarify his thought-process.
ReplyDeleteThe table does not bother to clarify what (13), (14), (15) etc
stand for in the first column. If these are years of service, then what are the figures (1-10), (11-20) etc for in the first header row?
Are the figures in columns 2, 3, 4 and 5 actual pay drawn or based on some logic only the table-maker understands?
The impression is this is just an exercise in table-doodling and expecting others to fill in the blanks. The anonymous sender could think of elaborating on what his point is so others can clarify, if at all possible.
Sir,
DeleteThe figures on the X axis i.e. 1-10 etc are first ten members of the Course etc
The figures in the Y axis in brackets are the number of years of service or qualifying service aka QS.
Comparing the figures in the tables in an Excel table of PIPB + GP + 3% increment and then adding MSP appears to indicate actual pay drawn.
The clarification sought might be whether OROP would remain as an ethereal concept if the Option B of the 7th CPC is implemented i.e pension based on notional pay progression to the Pay matrix.
What is the use of referring tables and colums when MOD is in deep slumber.
ReplyDeleteSir, I am sorry for not having been able to get back to the blog earlier.
ReplyDeleteThe doubts raised by @TaazaKhabar are genuine and point to the haphazard way in which OROP and VI/VII CPC pensions were fixed.
The doubts I had raised two and a half years ago remain doubts still. goo.gl/J5guDN