Monday 17 June 2019

More insights on Core Concerns of Defence Forces


DOEXP/R/2018/50802 dated 10 Jul 2018
Delayed Reply dated 14 Jun 2019 by MoF

Online RTI Request Form Details

RTI Request Details:-
RTI Request Registration number DOEXP/R/2018/50802
Public Authority Department of Expenditure
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Name Air Mshl S Y Savur PVSM AVSM retd
Personal details deleted by self

Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian

Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ? No

Description of Information Sought

(Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)

1. Please refer to supporting document.

2. Both MoD - D (Pay/Services) and Air Force Central Accounts Office have brought out that junior officers of the rank of Air Commodore (Brigadier) and Group Captain (Colonel) have been drawing higher total emoluments than Air Vice Marshal (Maj Gen), Air Marshal (Lt Gen) and Air Marshal in HAG plus and AOC-in-C (Army Cdr) grades of the Sixth Central Pay Commission dispensation.

3. MoD has referred vide ID No. 1(6)/2016/ D (Pay/Services) dated 16.8.2016 that a similar situation is taking place in the Seventh Central Pay Commission dispensation.

4. Please provide information as defined in Sec 2 (f) of the RTI Act 2005 including file notings, minutes of meetings, deliberations and other related material on the action taken by Deptt of Expenditure.

5. Please enable online payment of any additional fee for the information that would be provided.

Concerned CPIO ASHOK KUMAR (E.III.A)

Reply of CPIO, Deptt of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance

F No. 7/6/2019-E.III(A)
Ministry of Finance (Vitt Mantralaya)
Department of Expenditure (Vyaya Vibhag)
E.III.A Branch
North Block, New Delhi
Dated the 14 June 2019
To
Mr S Y Savur

Sub:     Information sought under RTI Act, 2005, reg            

Sir,

            This is with reference to your online RTI application with registration No. DOEXP/R/2019/50802 dated 10.07.2019 seeking information including file notings, deliberations, etc in relation to the matter where the junior officers of the rank of Air Commodore (Brigadier) and Group Captain (Colonel) have been drawing higher total emoluments than Air Vice Marshal (Maj Gen), Air Marshal (Lt Gen) and Air Marshal in HAG Plus and AOC-in-C (Army Cdr) grades. In this context, the copy of relevant extracts of the noting is attached herewith for reference. The delay in the submission of the reply is deeply regretted.   

2.         The Appellate Authority is Shri B K Manthan, Deputy Secretary (E.III.A), Department of Expenditure, Room No. 76A, North Block, New Delhi-110001. Appeal, if any may be preferred within 30 days of the receipt of this letter. 

Yours faithfully,
Enclosed as above                                                                                                              Sd/------------
14/6/2019
(Ashok Kumar)
Under Secretary (E.III.A) & CPIO
Ph: 23095650; akumar.doe@nic.in
Copy to: RTI Cell, Department of Expenditure, 5th Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, New Delhi

(Please note: original application is No. DOEXP/R/2018/50802 dated 10.07.2018 and ridiculously reply is dated 14 Jun 2019, almost a month before the incorrect application registration number and date has been received by Speed Post article ED642204195IN on 17 Jun 2019).


-Page 37-

            This case relates to demands and implementation of 7th CPC recommendations in respect of Defence Forces personnel.

2.         Defence Secretary vide his DO dated 14.11.2017 addressed to Secretary (Exp) intimated that Hon’ble Raksha Mantri has desired for a presentation on the manner in which the concerns/recommendations of the Defence Forces were addressed and the grounds of rejection of demands of Defence Forces by the MoD and the Ministry of Finance and requested for fixing a mutually convenient date for the meeting. He has enclosed a document dated 20.01.2016 of TRIPAS on Defence Forces concerns on 7th CPC report and copy of the proposed presentation on issues of Defence Forces.

3.         The following core concerns of the Defence Forces relating to their demands have been mentioned in the proposed presentation received along with Defence Secretary’s DO dated 14.11.2017.
           
(A)       PAY RELATED ISSUES. Out of six Core concerns, two have been resolved and following four concerns are remaining:

            i.          Military Service Pay (MSP) at higher rates for JCOs – MSP of (Rs) 10000 for JCO

            ii.         MSP as a separate element of pay for Maj General and above.

            iii.        Non Functional Upgradation (NFU)

            iv.        Correction in entry pays for 6 Ranks/Levels.

            (B)       PENSION RELATED ISSUES

            i.          Weightages to be restored to cater for truncated carrier (sic)  

            ii.         One Rank One Pension

            iii.        Sharing of report of One Man Judicial Committee (OMJC).

            (C)       ALLOWANCES RELATED ISSUES

Out of 19 concerns, 11 issues relating to entitlement of Ration to Officers in Peace Areas, Dress Allowances, Reciprocity of Allowances, Technical Allowances, Sea Going Allowances, Flying/SF/MARCOS/Chariot Allowance, Correction in RH Matrix, Restoration of CILQ, Qualification Pay (Q-Pay), GCB/GS Pay (and) Classification Allowances and Travel Entitlement of Navy have been mentioned.    

Similar issues were listed in the TRIPAS letter dated 20.01.2016 addressed to Hon’ble Raksha Mantri and Appendix A and B of this letter which have been summarised at F/A.

4.         A copy of Defence Secretary DO has been forwarded to Deputy Secretary (EG) for necessary action in respect of Allowances, since the records related to deliberations of the Committee of Secretaries on Allowances headed by the former FS is available with them. The position with regard to issues pertaining to pay and pension is explained in subsequent paras.       

5.         Demands of the Defence Forces already accepted:        The under mentioned demands of Defence Forces in respect of pay and pension has been accepted by Government.

-38-
Continued from previous page

(I)        Vide Cabinet approval dated 29.06.2016, the following exceptions in (the) Defence Pay Matrix were approved.

i. The IOR of Level 13A (Brigadier) in Defence Pay Matrix revised upwards from 2.57 to 2.67.

ii. Additional 3 stages in Levels 12A (Lt Col), 3 stages in Level 13 (Colonel) and 2 stages in Level 13A (Brigadier) added appropriately in the Defence Pay Matrix.

(II) The Defence Pay Matrix (except Military Nursing Service (MNS) which had 24 stages extended to 40 stages similar to Civilian Pay Matrix (Cabinet Approval May 2016).

(III) The Index of Rationalisation (IOR) of Levels 12A and 13 of Defence Pay Matrix enhanced from 2.57 to 2.67. The Defence Pay Matrix and Matrix of MNS have been accordingly revised. (Cabinet approval - May 2016).

(IV) Percentage based system for disability pension has been restored after the matter was referred/considered by National Anomaly Committee (Cabinet approval – May 2016).

(V) Demands for allowing broad-banding of disability pension for disability assessed at 20% and above and benefit of additional pension on attaining the age of 80 years and above applicable on disability element accepted (FM approval).

6.         With respect to the manner in which the concerns/recommendations of the Defence Forces were addressed it is submitted that Defence Forces made a presentation before the Empowered Committee chaired by Cabinet Secretary on 11.03.2016 on their demands. Subsequently a series of meetings were held with nodal authorities involved in the implementation of the 7th CPC Report and all the issues raised by the Defence Forces have (been) extensively discussed in these meetings. Joint Secretary (IC) and Director (IC) from the then Implementation Cell participated in these meetings. Based on the outcome of these consultations, proposals have been processed for obtaining approval of Cabinet. 

7.         The concerns of the Defence Forces were also received vide their letter dated 18.07. 2016 addressed to Hon’ble PM and letter dated 08.09.2016 addressed to Hon’ble RM. The matter was discussed in the meeting taken by the then RM (on) 13.04.2017 and MoD vide their OM dated 19.04.2017 recommended three core concerns i.e. 40 stages in Defence Pay Matrix, revision pf IoR for Level 12A (Lt Col), and 13 (Col) and grant of Personal Pay in 7th CPC pay structure to address pay/pension anomalies between Col/Brig and Maj Gen and above rank(s). The first two issues related to Defence Pay Matrix have already been addressed and (the) third issue pertaining to grant of Personal Pay for Maj Gen and above, MoD advised to approach DoPT, the nodal Ministry concerned with pay fixation issues. 

8.         With respect to demands of the Defence Forces not accepted/grounds of rejection of demands, the position in respect of pay and pension issues is submitted as under:

-39-
Continued from previous page

(a)        Military Service Pay (MSP) at higher rates for JCOs – MSP of (Rs) 10000 for JCO

Comments – The concept of MSP was introduced by 6th CPC (up to Brigadier rank) as an edge for the Army over civilian counterparts and it was treated as Pay for calculating DA, Pension, HRA, Composite Transfer Grant and Annual increment. MSP by the 7th CPC has been calculated by multiplying existing rate with 2.57 and subsequent rounding off. As the amount of MSP was Rs 2000/- for JCO/OR in 6th CPC period which has been increased to Rs 5200/- by 7th CPC, the demand for change in rates of MSP has not been accepted. Similarly, MSP for Serving Officers has been increased from Rs 6000/- to Rs 15500/-.

(b)        MSP as a separate element of pay for Maj Gen and above

Comment – MSP is admissible to all ranks up to and inclusive of Brigadiers and their equivalents. In so far as higher ranks are concerned separate MSP is not admissible in 6th CPC also. However, MSP is subsumed under Pay on promotion from Brig to Maj Gen. The aspect to grant of MSP in the 6th CPC regime was considered and grant of Personal Pay to the officers of the ranks of Maj Gen and above was agreed by the DoPT. For similar dispensation in 7th CPC period, MoD vide this Department OM dated 05.09.2017 has been requested to take up the matter with the DoPT as this relates to fixation of pay related matter which comes under the purview of DoPT. 

(c)        Non Functional Upgradation (NFU)

Comments – The Commission has not been able to arrive as at consensus on extension of NFU, granted to organised Group ‘A’ services at the time of 6th CPC, to Defence Forces. The Chairman was of the view that the NFU should be allowed to continue and be extended to CAPFs and Defence Forces. Shri Vivek Rae and Dr Rathin Roy, Members were of the view that NFU be withdrawn from organised Group ‘A’ services.  

Since the Commission could not arrive at a consensus, the matter has been referred to Department of Personnel and Training for examination before a final view is taken. Therefore, it would not be appropriate to consider any fresh proposal at this stage.  

(d)        Correction of Entry Level Pay for 6 Ranks based on Minimum Fitment Table

Comment – Defence Forces have demanded for correction in the Entry Pay for the ranks of Artificer (GP 3400), Captain (GP 6100), Major (GP 7600), Lt Col (GP 8000), Colonel (8700) and Maj Gen (10000) on the basis of Residency method. The 7th CPC recommended separate Pay Matrix for Defence Forces after due diligence and detailed stakeholder consultation. The 7th CPC noted there are a number of common strands in the Civil and Defence pay matrices, the principle and philosophy on which they are based are identical. The Commission in para 5.2.15 stated that these GPs are unique to Defence Forces personnel and minimum pay corresponding to each of these pay levels takes into account the normative residency period of the ranks of officers.

-40-
Continued from previous page

            Although TRIPAS has mentioned about some difference in figure based on the correct application of residency period method, it is submitted that while devising Pay Matrix, the 7th CPC ensured that horizontal relativities are not disturbed as for example the entry pay of Brig based on residency period comes out to Rs 59,100 which is much higher than entry pay (Rs 53000) equal to that of Joint Secretary. 

9.         With respect to pension related issues it is submitted that three issues listed i.e. weightages to be restored to cater for truncated career, One Rank One Pension (OROP) and sharing of report of One Man Judicial Committee (OMJC). About weightages issue, it is submitted MoD vide their OM dated 19.04.2017 recommended grant of 40 stages in the Defence Pay Matrix for JCOs/ORs subject to the caveat that maximum of the scale will not be counted towards calculation of pension and the approval of cabinet has bee taken vide Cabinet note dated 01.05.2017. The other two issues about OROP and Report of OMJC relate to MoD.     

10.       Defence Forces have requested for issue of resolution of 7th CPC core concerns on pay, allowances and pension in a time bound manner and constitution of an Empowered Committee with representation of Defence Services for resolution of other anomalies of Defence Services. Although these issues have been raised by the Defence Forces in the past and decisions have been taken after taking into account the different aspects involved. The file is submitted for further consideration, please.  

Sd/-------------
23/11/17
Dir (E.III.A)

            The above note may kindly be seen in the context of the DO letter dt 14.11.2017 from Defence Secretary to Expenditure Secretary seeking latter’s convenience for a meeting to discuss the concerns of the Defence Forces personnel on the recommendation of the 7th CPC.

2.         Attached herewith the aforesaid DO letter from Defence Secretary is a note of 20.1.2018 listing out issues raised by Defence Forces soon after the submission of the Report of the 7th CPC. However, during the processing of the Report of the 7th CPC is the erstwhile IC, a few concerns have already been addressed, as mentioned in para 7 of above note.

3.         There is no indication from the note

-41-
From previous page

            sent along with the DO letter from Defence Secy as to which issues still remain and if these were considered by MoD, what the stand taken have been, as well as the grounds on which these were not accepted. 

4.         Furthermore, and more importantly, these issues require proper consideration, but in the midst of the Budget exercise, it is difficult to spare proper attention to these issues. 

5.                  Thus we may suggest that MoD may schedule this meeting after presentation of the Union Budget. A draft DO letter is, accordingly, placed below for approval of Expenditure Secretary.

Sd/--------------
27.11.17
JS (Pers)

            As we are very preoccupied with the Budget exercise, it may be difficult to devote so much time on this exercise. Also, the Concerns of the Defence Services on 7th CPC Report is dated 20/01/16. Some issues have already been addressed, as brought out in the note of US/RG. MoD may, in the meantime, prepare an updated document. For approval on the issue. 

Sd/---------------
27/11/17
Secy (Exp)  Sd/------------ 28/11/17

JS (Pers)  On tour

Dir (E.III.A)   Sd /-----------291.11.17

US (RG) Sd/-----------

SO (E.III.A)

DO letter from Expenditure Secretary

Ajay Narayan Jha

D.O. No. 20-1/11(1)/2016-IC (Vol-II)                                                         29th November 2017


Dear Sanjay,

            Please refer to your D.O. letter No. 1(2)/2016-D (Pay/Services)/137/Def Secy/2017 dated 14.11.2017 regarding a meeting proposed to be held to discuss the concerns of the Defence Forces personnel in the context of the recommendations of the 7th Central Pay Commission.

2.         We intend to accord our sincere consideration to the genuine concerns of the Defence Forces personnel. This requires full attention on our part. However, in the midst of the current Budget exercise, it is difficult for us to apply ourselves to this important consideration in a manner we deem it appropriate. I would, therefore, suggest that a meeting in this behalf may be scheduled after the presentation of the Union Budget.  

3.         I would also request that prior to the meeting, a brief note may be sent to us, bringing our the issues raised by the Defence Forces after the submission of the Report of the 7th CPC, the issues which have been sorted out based on the Government decisions and the grounds on which the remaining issues have not been accepted.

With best regards

Your sincerely
Sd/-------------
(A N Jja)
Shri Sanjay Mitra
Defence Secretary
Ministry of Defence
South Block
New Delhi


Issued 29/11/17

*          *          *          *          *          *          *          *

















































Thursday 13 June 2019

Equalisation OROP ; Authenticity not assured; RTI request to validate has been filed


Please treat with caution as there are no signatures of the Jt CGDA (Pension) in the info received by email and WhatsApp



(Received from Brig V Raheja, Sigs (retd)



Office of the CGDA, Ulan Batar Road, Palam, Delhi Cantt-10



Sub: Re-fixation of pension under OROP – reg



            Ministry may kindly refer to their ID No. 1(1)/2019/D(Pen/Pol) dated 28.03.2019 forwarding a copy of TRIPAS letter No. C/7026/VII CPC/84/OROP dated 11.03. 2019. However, copy of ibid TRIPAS letter has not been found enclosed. It is requested to kindly forward the same.



2.         Further, vide Para 3 of ibid ID, Ministry has requested to start preparatory work for re-fixation of pension under OROP as per para 3 (v) of MoD letter dated 7.11.2015. In order to begin this work, Ministry if requested to clarify the following:



(a)        With reference to Para 3 of GoI, MoD letter dt 07.11.2015, it may be confirmed whether the same methodology is to be employed for calculating OROP rates viz. average of minimum and maximum pension. If so, the year from which data of current retirees is to be used may be specified.



(b)        OROP was implemented w.e.f. 01.07.2014. Similarly date of effect of this next round of revisions may kindly be intimated.



(c)        It may be recalled that several issues and anomalies regarding OROP implementation had been raised earlier. Government had referred three (03) major categories of these issues to a One Man Judicial Commission appointed vide No. 12(01)/2014-D (Pen/Pol) dated 14.12.2015. Various ESM associations had also made reference to this OMJC. The report of the OMJC is pending with the Ministry. It may be clarified whether any of the recommendations of the OMJC are to be factored into the new calculations. 



3.         It may be mentioned here that there have been several developments since the issue of OROP orders in 2015-16. The most significant is the implementation of the recommendations of VII CPC. The impact of these recommendations with respect to revision of defence pension was not factored into the OROP orders. As per the VIIth CPC orders, pension revision is to be undertaken by two methods as pension disbursed by the more beneficial of the two. The first method requires multiplication of pension as on 31.12.2015 by a factor of 2.57. This has been done by PDAs. The other method requires notional revision of pay across subsequent Pay commission scales to arrive at a notional pay (an pension) under VIIth CPC scales. This revision has raised the following issues:



(a)        The notional pay formula brings all past pensioners to current rates, almost as if they were serving under VIIth CPC. This is also the formula used in various Court judgments seeking to equate past pensioners with current retirees. For example Hon’ble Supreme Court judgment in SPS Vains vs. UOI (2008) case and in DS Nakara case. As such it is a matter for consideration as to whether any logic exists to initiate the process of OROP revision once the pension of past and current pensioners has been equated w.e.f. 01.01.2016.



(b)        The notional pay based revision in respect of defence pensioners has just commenced. The final pension of past pensioners (as on 1.1.2016) is not available until this is completed. Therefore, data for comparing past pensioners with current pensioners is incomplete to that extent.



(c)        Ministry may also kindly refer to WP No. 419 of 2016 – Indian Ex-Servicemen Movement and others vs UOI. While preparing to brief the Ld ASG, Ministry requested to compare pension under various Pay Commissions. The result was forwarded to Ministry vide this HQ UO dated 23.08.2018 (copy enclosed). The sample study indicated that application of multiplication factor to OROP pension has created an anomaly whereby past pensioners are drawing higher pension than those who have retired between 1.7.2014 and 31.12.2015 and post 1.1.2016 retirees. It may be recalled that Service HQ have also forwarded proposals citing this anomaly and seeking protection of pension of current retirees with respect to OROP pension. If this anomaly turns out to be widespread, the logic of revising pension of past retirees to bring them to the level of current of current pensioners would not subsist.   



4.     Ministry is requested to give directions of how to proceed further in view of the points mentioned above.



Sd/----------------

(Kanwaldeep Singh)

Jt CGDA (Pension)

Shri Pudi Hari Prasad, Joint Sec (ESW)

MoD, Deptt of ESW

South Block, New Delhi

5699/AT-P/OROP-2/Vol-I dated 05.04.2019



Copy to:



1.         Shri R K Karna IDAS, MoD (Fin), South Block, New Delhi – For information w.r.t. above



2.         PCDA (P) Allahabad   - For information with request to compile data in r/o/para 3 (c) above.



Sd/----------------

(Kanwaldeep Singh)

Jt CGDA (Pension)





Please treat with caution as there are no signatures of the Jt CGDA (Pension) in the info received by email and WhatsApp









Tuesday 4 June 2019

Second Appeal vs DESW - No record of dates of Internal Committee meetings!


BY SPEED POST

Right to Information Act, 2005

Second Appeal No.
[For Office Use only]
           
INDEX OF SECOND APPEAL

S No.
Subject
Dated of origin
Annexure
Page(s) Number(s)
Related to this Second Appeal
1
Index of this Second Appeal
-
-
1
2
Second Appeal
05.6.2019
-
2-4
3
MoD 237/RTI/2014/D (P/P) – Part II on the constitution of an Internal Committee
20.2.2019
A
5-8
4
Request No. DEXSW/R/2019/50344
03.4.2019
B
9
5
Reply by CPIO vide 237/RTI/2014/D (P/P) – Part II
07.5.2019
C
10-11
6
First Appeal No. DEXSW/A/2019/60049
07.5.2019
D
12-13
7
FAA Order in Appeal vide 237/RTI/2014/D (P/P) – Part II
03.6.2019
E
14

Place: Bengaluru - 560038                                                     
Date:   5th June 2019                                                               (S. Y. SAVUR)  
Name of the applicant/Appellant

*          *          *          *          *          *          *         

Right to Information Act, 2005
Second Appeal before Central Information Commission
Submitted under Section 19 of the Right to Information Act -2005

1.         Name and Address of the Appellant: Air Marshal S Y Savur PVSM AVSM (retd); 141, Jal Vayu Towers, NGEF Layout, Indira Nagar (PO), Bengaluru - 560038

2.         Name and address of the Central Public Information Officer to whom the application was addressed: - Shri Ashok Kumar, CPIO & Under Secretary, Deptt of Ex-Servicemen’s Welfare (Pen/Pol), Ministry of Defence (MoD), Sena Bhawan, New Delhi - 110011

3.         Name and address of the Central Public Information Officer who gave reply to the application: - Shri Ashok Kumar, CPIO & Under Secretary, Deptt of Ex-Servicemen’s Welfare (Pen/Pol), Ministry of Defence (MoD), Sena Bhawan, New Delhi - 110011

4.         Name and address of the First Appellate Authority Appeal: - Shri A K Agrawal, First Appellate Authority & Deputy Secretary, Deptt of Ex-Servicemen’s Welfare, Ministry of Defence (MoD), Sena Bhawan, New Delhi – 110 011  

5.         Name and address of the First Appellate Authority Appeal who passed order on the appeal: -  Shri A K Agrawal, First Appellate Authority & Deputy Secretary, Deptt of Ex-Servicemen’s Welfare, Ministry of Defence (MoD), Sena Bhawan, New Delhi – 110 011  

6.         Particulars of the application and reply, including number and date, name and address of CPIO to whom the application was made: -

(a)        RTI Online Application No. DEXSW/R/2019/50344 dated 03.4.2019 (Annexure B)
            (b)        Reply vide F No. 237/RTI/2014/D (P/P) – Part II dated 07.5.2019 (Annexure C)
(c)        Shri Ashok Kumar, CPIO & Under Secretary, Deptt of Ex-Servicemen’s Welfare (Pen/Pol), Ministry of Defence (MoD), Sena Bhawan, New Delhi – 110011

7.         Particulars of the Appeal and Order, including number and date, name and address of FAA  against which the appeal is preferred: -

            (a)        RTI Online Appeal No. DEXSW/A/2019/60049 dated 07.5.2019 (Annexure D)
(b)        Order vide F No. 237/RTI/2014/D (P/P) – Part II dated 03.6.2016 received online on 04.6.2019 (Annexure E)
(c)        Shri A K Agrawal, First Appellate Authority & Deputy Secretary, Deptt of Ex-Servicemen’s Welfare, Ministry of Defence (MoD), Sena Bhawan, New Delhi – 110 011  

8.         Brief Facts leading to Second Appeal: -

(a)        Government issued orders for implementing One Rank One Pension (OROP) to family and Veteran pensioners of the Armed Forces on 07.11.2015.

(b)        The ibid order included the constitution of a One Man Judicial Committee (OMJC) of retired Chief Justice Reddy, (presently Chairman of the Central Administrative Tribunal). The OMJC submitted its report and recommendations to MoD in October 2016. 

(c)        After approval of Raksha Mantri, Deptt of Ex-Servicemen’s Welfare of MoD constituted an Internal Committee (IC) vide F No. 1 (7)/2016-D (Pen/Pol) dated 19.7.2017 to peruse the recommendations of the OMJC and advise the MoD on further steps. The convening order for the Internal Committee was signed by then Under Secretary of Deptt of Ex-Servicemen’s Welfare (Annexure A). Brief details of the Internal Committee are as follows:  -

            (i)         Shri Ravi Kant, Joint Secretary, Ex-Servicemen’s Welfare (ESW)
            (ii)        Shri R K Karna, Joint Secretary & Additional Financial Adviser (RK) and
(iii)       Shri Kanwaldeep Singh, Joint Controller General of Defence Accounts (Pension)

            (d)        The Terms of Reference (ToR) of the IC were

                        (i)         Examine and analyse the recommendations
                        (ii)        To examine the feasibility of implementation, and
                        (iii)       To work out financial implications.

(e)        The Internal Committee was mandated to submit its report within two months (from the date of its constitution on 19.7.2017.

(f)        The recommendations of the OMJC were not placed in the public domain, even though there were numerous assurances made by the Govt to Veterans till 03.4.2019. Therefore, this applicant/appellant, attaching some information (Annexure A) received from the office of CPIO & US in Deptt of Ex-Servicemen’s Welfare as supporting document requested vide application DEXSW/R/2019/50344 (Annexure B) for following specific, permissible information: -    

                        (a) How many meetings have been held by the (Internal) Committee?
(b) The dates on which each of meetings were held
(c) Names and designations of the officers who attended the Internal Committee meetings including the Chairman and members and on which dates they attended the meetings.

(g)        CPIO & Under Secretary, Deptt of Ex-Servicemen’s Welfare, did not provide the information and instead furnished a copy of the convening order of the Internal Committee (Annexure C) which was provided by an earlier CPIO (Annexure A) and is irrelevant and unconnected to the request.

(h)        Aggrieved by the CPIO by neither providing the information requested nor denying it, this appellant filed the first Appeal No. DEXSW/A/2019/60049 (Annexure D).

(j)         In his Order (Annexure E), the FAA has stated that “details of the meetings held are not with CPIO”.  Incredulity was the first reaction of this appellant on reading such a statement.

(k)        It is inconceivable that no records are available with the CPIO & Under Secretary from whose office a signed the convening order on behalf of Raksha Mantri has been given to the Internal Committee. It is an established fact the Govt/Ministry/Department/Division maintains a record of every meeting, even notes of action are put on file after implementing verbal orders of superior officers and Ministers.
  
9.         Prayer or relief sought: This appellant prays for the following relief under Section 19: - 

(a)        CPIO & Under Secretary may be ordered to provide correct information pertaining to the instant request (Annexure B). It is for the honourable CIC to consider if such a reply would be acceptable to the higher officers that Under Secretary in the Deptt of Ex-Servicemen’s Welfare has no details of a Committee convened under orders of Raksha Mantri.

(b)        FAA be cautioned to ensure that he applies his mind to ascertain how minutes of meetings and attendance records are not with his own Under Secretary.  It is matter of grave concern that the Deptt of Ex-Servicemen’s Welfare, more importantly the Under Secretary who signed the convening order for the constitution of the Internal Committee is unaware of the meetings of the Internal Committee that might have taken place.
  
(c)        CIC is requested to impose a penalty under Section 20 (1) of the RTI Act, 2005 on the CPIO for providing erroneous information and on the FAA for filibustering, not applying his mind as to how could important information not be available with the Under Secretary dealing with the subject matter.

10.       Grounds for the prayer or relief: -  

(a)        The honourable Prime Minister stated on the occasion of Diwali in 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2018 that OROP has been fully implemented. But the administrative Deptt viz. Deptt of Ex-Servicemen’s Welfare does not, purportedly, possess records of important meetings of decisions that affect/benefit lakhs of Defence Pensioners.

(b)        The honourable PM has been stating that Armed Forces personnel are most important for maintaining National security. Today’s serving personnel will retire and will also be affected/benefited by the MoD implementing recommendations of the OMJC.
 
(c)        OROP affects/benefits 18.5 lakh Defence Forces family pensioners and Veterans. OMJC was to constituted by late Shri Manohar Parrikar, then Raksha Mantri in his wisdom to redress grievances, if any, in the implementation of the OROP scheme in the MoD order of 07.11.2015. Therefore, either the CPIO and/or FAA are being economical with the truth. 

(d)        Both the Under Secretary (& CPIO) as well as the Deputy Secretary (& FAA) of Deptt of Ex-Servicemen’s Welfare must be aware that they, as per GoI rules, are custodians of the files concerning their departments. Further, there is an elaborate procedure in the Central Secretariat Manual of Office Procedure (CSMoP) on how to record, retain and archive important decisions. Surely a matter that affects 18.5 lakh Defence Forces pensioners including widows of those who have laid down their lives in the service of the nation cannot be treated in such a cavalier manner. 

11.       Other Information Related to the Second Appeal

Nil
12.       Verification/Authentication by the Appellant: I hereby verify that the aforementioned facts are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I also declare that this matter is not previously filed with this Commission or is pending with any Court or Tribunal or Authority. I also declare that I have authenticated all copies attached to this Second Appeal.


Place: Bengaluru - 560038                                                     
Date:   5th June 2019                                                               (S. Y. SAVUR)  
Name of the applicant/Appellant

*          *          *          *          *          *          *