Please note: - The total number of pages in the Report is 90. Only 19 pages are in the public domain. The complete Report with who said what is awaited.
Annexure – I
(of the Koshyari Committee Report)
LIST OF REPRESENTATIVES OF NGOs AND INDIVIDUALS WHO APPEARED BEFORE THE
COMMITTEE ON PETITIONS PRAYING FOR GRANT OF ONE RANK ONE PENSION TO THE ARMED
FORCES PERSONNEL
I Indian Ex-Services League,
Chanakyapuri, Delhi
1. Brig R K S
Gulia, President
2. Brig Kartar
Singh, Rajasthan State Ex-Services League
3. AVM R P
Mishra, Vice President
4. Commander B B
Sharma (retd)
II All India Ex-Services Welfare
Association, R K Puram, New Delhi
1. Lt Col
Inderjit Singh (retd)
2. Brig Bhagwan
Singh (retd)
3. Capt U R
Nikam (retd)
4. Lt Nar Singh
Dass (retd)
5. Capt Bhagwan
Dass (retd)
6. Sub Mange Ram
(retd)
III Retired Defence Officers Association
(Regd) Dwarka, Delhi
1. Lt Col B K
Sharma (retd)
2. Lt Col
Satwant Singh
IV All-India Ex-Para Military Personnel
Association, Dehradun, Uttarakhand
1. Shri S S
Kothiyal IG (retd)
2. Ahri A Alur
IG (retd)
3. Shril M L
Verma IG (retd)
4. Shri H G Garg
IG (retd)
V Dehradun Ex-Services League, Dehradun
1. Brigadier K G
Behl (retd) President
2. Brig R S
Rawat (retd)
3. Col M M P
Kala (retd)
VI Indian Ex-Servicemen Movement, Gurgaon
1. Maj Gen
Satbir Singh (retd)
2. Lt Gen R S
Kadyan, Chairman, IESM
3. Col R P
Chaturvedi
4. Sub Mah (Hony
Lt) Kameshwar Pandey
VII All India Central Confederation of
Pensioners Association, Patparganj, Delhi
1. Shri S S
Ramachandran, Gen Secy
2. Col P K Singh
VIII Individual Representatives
1. Vice Admiral Harinder Singh (retd) PVSM, AVSM,
Noida
2. Rear Admiral
Arun Saxena (retd) AVSM, VSM, Gurgaon
3. Brigadier V
Mahalingan (retd) Noida
ANNEXURE – II
FOCAL POINTS ON THE PRESENTATION MADE BY REPRESENTATIVES OF INDIAN ARMY
ON 27TH MAY 2011
SLIDE 1
TITLE: OROP
·
IN
MILITARY, EQUALITY IN SERVICE HAS TWO COMPONENTS
Ø
RANK
Ø
LENGTH OF
SERVICE
·
HENCE TWO
MILITARY PERSONS IN SAME RANK AND EQUAL LENGTH OF SERVICE SHOULD GET SAME
PENSION IRRESPECTIVE OF DATE OF RETIREMENT
SLIDE 2
TITLE: IMPLICATIONS OF OROP
·
UNIFORM
PENSION TO BE PAID TO THE ARMED FORCES PERSONNEL RETIRING IN THE SAME RANK WITH
SAME LENGTH OF SERVICE IRRESPECTIVE OF DATE OF RETIREMENT
·
ANY
FUTURE ENHANCEMENT IN RATES OF PENSION BE AUTOMATICALLY PASSED ON TO THE PAST
PENSIONERS
SLIDE 3
TITLE: RECOMMENDATIONS ON OROP
·
HISTORY
OF RECOMMENDATIONS
· CURRENT STATUS
Ø IMPROVEMENT OF PENSIONARY BENEFITS OF JCOs/OR
Ø
GOVT HAS
ATTEMPTED TO BRIDGE THE GAP FOR JCOs/ORS
Ø
ATTEMPT
TO BRIDGE GAP FOR OFFICERS LIMITED TO LT GENs ONLY
Ø
DIFFERENCE
IN PERCEPTIONS EXIST – BANE OF THE PROBLEM
SLIDE 4
TITLE: IMPORTANT PRONOUNCEMENTS
·
PRE
10.10.1997 JCO/OR PENSIONERS BROUGHT AT PAR WITH 10.10.1997 PENSIONERS
·
ENHANCED
RATE OF CLASSIFICATION ALLOWANCE FOR PENSION
·
PENSION
OF ALL 01.01.2006 JCOs AND ORs BROUGHT AT PAR WITH POST 01.01.2006 RETIREES
·
SEPARATE
PAY SCALES OF Rs 67000-79000 CREATED TO ADDRESS ISSUE OF DISPARITY IN PRE AND
POST 01.01.2006 PENSIONERS OF LT GEN RANK
·
BENEFIT
OF BROAD BANDING OF DISABILITY/WAR INJURY PENSION PARTIALLY RESOLVED
·
BRIG K P
SINGH DEO (RETD) COMMITTEE REPORT 1983
SLIDE 5
TITLE: EXAMPLES
·
DIFFERENCE
IN PENSION BETWEEN LT COL AND MAJ GEN Rs
1000/-
·
DIFFERENCE
IN PENSION BETWEEN COL AND BRIG Rs
100/-
·
DIFFERENCE
IN PENSION BETWEEN MAJ AND LT COL Rs
11600/-
·
WIDE
DIFFERENCE IN PENSION OR PRE AND POST 2006 FAMILY OF PENSIONERS
·
DIFFERENCE
IN PENSION BETWEEN PRE AND POST 2006 ORs
·
PRE-2006
HAV PENSIONERS GET LOWER PENSION THAN A POST 1.1.2006 SEPOY
·
PRE-2006
MAJ GEN PENSIONER GETS LOWER PENSION THAN POST 1.1.2006 LT COL
SLIDE 6
TITLE: ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
·
ABSOLUTE
FIGURES AFTER GOVT IMPROVEMENTS
o JCOs/Ors
o OFFICERS
·
APPARENT
REASONS FOR DIFFERENCES
o PAY SCALES TO RUNNING PAY BANDS AND FITMENT
TABLES TO BOTTOM OF THE BAND
o EXCLUSION OF NEW SCHEMES e.g. ACP TO PAST
RETIREE PENSION CALCULATIONS – CONCERTINA EFFECT
SLIDE 7
TITLE: WAY
OUT
SOLUTION RECOMMENDED
WILL SATISFY 90% OF EX-SERVICEMEN (SUPPORTED BY RECENT JUDGMENTS)
·
PRE 01
JAN 06 RETIREES BROUGHT AT PAR WITH POST 01 JAN 06 RETIREES (EVERY PAY
COMMISSION)
·
RUNNING
PAY BAND PROBLEM TO BE RESOLVED AS UNDER: -
o OFFICERS: FIX A BENCH MARK WITHIN THE
RUNNING PAY BAND FOR EACH RANK BASED ON MINIMUM SERVICE FOR EACH RANK e.g
§
LT COL
(13 YEARS) – BOTTOM OF PB-4+GP+NEW PAY AND ALL CES
§
COL (15
YEARS) – AS ABOVE + 2 INCREMENTS
§
COL (TS)
– 26 YEARS – AS ABOVE +3 INCREMENTS
·
JCOs/ORs:
AS HAS BEEN DONE + BENEFIT OF ACP AND NEW PAY AND ALLOWANCE
·
NEW
ALLOWANCES BENEFIT CARRY NO ARREARS
·
SIMILAR
EXERCISE TO BE CARRIED OUT FOR PRE-2006 FAMILY PENSIONERS (ALL TYPES)
·
RE-FIXATION
AT EVERY FIVE YEARS TO REDUCE GAP
·
RESTORATION
OF WEIGHTAGES FOR PENSION
·
EXTENSION
OF NON-FUNCTIONAL UPGRADATION AS IN CASE OF CIVIL CADRES
SLIDE 8
TITLE: PENSION OF JCOs AND ORs
RANK
|
PRE 01 JAN 2006 (ORIGINAL VI CPC)
|
Revised Pre 01 Jan 2006 (Revised by Govt)
|
Post 01 Jan 2006
|
|||
X Gp
|
Y Gp
|
X Gp
|
Y Gp
|
X Gp
|
Y Gp
|
|
Sep
(19 yrs)
|
4679
|
4348
|
6227
|
5330
|
8025
|
7045
|
Nk
(24 yrs)
|
5175
|
4908
|
6900
|
6046
|
8200
|
7245
|
Hav
(26 yrs)
|
6062
|
5496
|
7905
|
6783
|
9410
|
8220
|
Nb Sub
(28 yrs)
|
8450
|
7750
|
11510
|
10675
|
11510
|
10675
|
Sub
(30 yrs)
|
11066
|
10532
|
13105
|
11970
|
13105
|
11970
|
Sub Maj
|
11350
|
10793
|
13450
|
12285
|
13590
|
12285
|
PENSION OF OFFICERS
|
||
Rank
|
Pre 01 Jan 2006
|
Post 01 Jan 2006
|
Maj
|
14100
|
22135
|
Lt Col
|
25700
|
28695
|
Col
|
26050
|
30375
|
Brig
|
26150
|
31170
|
Maj Gen
|
26700
|
33925
|
Lt Gen
|
36500
|
39500
|
SLIDE 9
TITLE: MAJ RECOMMENDATIONS OF SHRI K P
SINGH DEO COMMITTEE
·
RESTORATION
OF PENSION AS EXISTED PRIOR TO III CPC – LITERALLY OROP EXISTED
·
RANK
PLAYED A VERY IMPORTANT ROLE IN MILITARY. REFLECTED ITS ETHOS AND IS ALLOWED TO
BE RETAINED AS PER OUR CONSTITUTION. EVEN AFTER RETIREMENT, PENSIONS SHOULD BE
RANK BASED
·
EVERY
SUBSTANTIVE OFFICER, JCO AND OTHERS SHOULD RECEIVED THE PENSION OF RANK HELD ON
RETIREMENT IRRESPECTIVE OF THEIR VINTAGE AND DATE OF RETIREMENT.
Note:- Pi charts on proportion of ranks vis-à-vis civilians
etc under preparation as author is not fluent in PowerPoint.
Contention points/statements highlighted in Red
* * * * *
No comments:
Post a Comment