Dear Readers,
With Pension based on Notional Pay, What happens to OROP? Any expert comments are welcome
Below are some of the ready references.
A. GoI, MoD No 17(4)/2008(1)/D(Pen/Policy)
dated 11.11.2008
“4. Consolidation of Pension
4.1. The Pension/Family Pension of existing Pre-1.1.2006
pensioners/family pensioners will be consolidated with effect from 1.1.2006 by
adding together:
(i) The
Existing Pension (including commuted portion of pension, if any)/ Existing
Family Pension.
(ii) Dearness
Pension, if any, as applicable from 1.4.2004 to those retired /died prior to
1.4.2004.
(iii) Dearness
Relief upto AI CPI (IW) 536 i.e. 24% of basic pension/family pension plus
dearness pension.
(iv) Fitment
weightage @ 40% of the Existing Pension/Existing Family Pension. Where the
amount of fitment weightage work s out in fraction of a rupee, it will be
rounded off to the next higher rupee.
NOTE: Where
the Existing Pension/Existing Family Pension includes the effect of merger of 50%
of Dearness Pay in respect of those retired/died on or after 1.4.2004, the
existing pension/family pension for the purpose of fitment weightage will be
re-calculated after excluding the merged Dearness Pay of 50% from emoluments
for computation of existing pension/existing family pension. This will be in
line with the definition of “Existing Pension” and “Existing Family Pension”
given in Para 3 of these orders.
4.2. The
amount so arrived at in terms of Para 4.1 above will be regarded as
consolidated pension/family pension with effect from 1.1.2006. Since the
consolidated pension will be inclusive of commuted portion of pension, if any,
the amount of pension commuted will be deducted from the said amount while
making monthly disbursements.
5. The consolidation of pension will further
be subject to the provision that the consolidated pension, in no case shall be
lower than fifty percent of the minimum of the pay in the pay band plus the
grade pay corresponding to the pre revised scale from which the pensioner had
retired/discharged including Military Service Pay and ‘X’ Group pay where
applicable.
For
example, if a pensioner had retired in the pre-revised scale of pay of 6600 –
170 – 9320, the corresponding pay band being 9300 - 34800 and the corresponding
grade pay and Military Service Pay being Rs. 4,600/- and Rs. 2,000/-
respectively, his minimum guaranteed pension would be 50% of Rs. 9300 + Rs 4600
+ 2000 i.e. Rs 7,950 for 33 years of qualifying service. The pension so
calculated will be reduced pro-rata, where the pensioner had less than the
maximum required service of 33 years for full pension and in no case it will be
less than Rs. 3,500/-. In case the pension consolidated as per Para 4.1 above
is higher than the pension calculated in the manner indicated above, the same
(higher consolidated pension) will be treated as Basic Pension with effect from
1.1.2006.
B. MoD, vide No. 12
(1)/2014/D (Pen/Policy) – Part II dated 3.2.2016 has stated as follows:
“6….. If revised pension as on 1.7.2014
worked out in terms of these orders happens to be less than the existing
pension/family pension as on 1.7.2014, the pension shall not be revised to the
disadvantage of the pensioner.
10. The OROP shall be
basic pension from 1.7.2014…..”
C. GOI, MOD letter No. 1(2)/2016 - D(Pen/Pol)
dated 30th September 2016
“4…… Therefore, it has been decided that
w.e.f. 1.1.2006 revised consolidated pension and family pension of pre-2006
armed forces pensioners shall not be lower than 50% and 30% respectively of the
minimum of the pay in the Pay Band plus Grade Pay corresponding to the
pre-revised scale from which the pensioner had retired/discharged/invalided
out/died including Military Service Pay and Group X pay, if any, without
pro-rata reduction of pension even if they had rendered qualifying service of
less than 33 years at the time of
retirement. Accordingly, Para 5 of this Ministry’s letter dated 11.11.2008
would stand modified to this extent.”
D. The Govt of India (and MoD) has approved (GoI,
MoD letter No. 17 (01)/2016-D (Pen/Pol) dated 29th October 2016) that pension in the 7th CPC
dispensation would be based on notional pay on the date of retirement/death.
The exact wordings are as follows:
“It was provided in the ibid Govt letter
(GoI, MoD letter No. 17 (01)/2016-D (Pen/Pol) dated 29th October
2016. It was provided in the ibid Govt letter that the revised pension/family
pension w.e.f. 1.1.2016 of pre-2016 pensioners/family pensioners shall be
determined by multiplying the Basic Pension (before commutation/Basic Family
Pension (exclusive of Dearness Relief) as has been drawn on 31.12.2015 by 2.57
to arrive at revised pension under 7th CPC.
3. Revised pension/family pension of all
Armed Forces Personnel who retired/died prior to 01.01.2016 shall be revised by
notionally fixing their pay in the pay matrix recommended by the 7th
CPC in the level corresponding to the pay in the pay scale/pay band and grade
pay at which they retired/died. This will be done by notional pay fixation
under each intervening Pay Commission based on the formula for revision of pay.
The revised rates of Military Service Pay, Non-Practising Allowance, where
applicable and ‘X’ Group pay & Classification Allowance for JCOs/ORs, if applicable notified in terms of
7th CPC orders, shall also be added to the amount of pay notionally
arrived at under the 7th CPC matrix and shall be termed as notional
reckonable emoluments as on 01.01.2016….”
E: Some back of the envelope
figures
Minimum
Notional Pay of Lt Col viz. PIPB Rs 37400 + GP 8000 + MSP 6000 = Rs 51400 and
pension Rs 25700 in the 13th year of service.
With an annual
increment of 3%, the Lt Col’s Notional Pay works out to Rs 55840 + 6000 = Rs
61840. Pension would therefore be Rs 30920 (rounded off to nearest Rs
10/-).
However, Table
1 of Circular 555 shows the pension of Lt Col at 20 years service as Rs 31305
i.e. the Notional Pay is Rs 62610.
But Annexure A
of Circular 568 shows minimum Notional Pay for Lt Col (TS) as Rs 52530 and
pension as Rs 26265.
Some (un)helpful tables? Some have forwarded these on WhatsApp. Hope they have checked accuracy as some figures have been intentionally changed to catch those plagiarists.
Remember what your pay + RP or PIPB+GP+MSP was on the date of your retirement?
Capt/Lt/Flt Lt
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Component
|
4th Pay +RP
|
4th Pension
|
5th Pay + RP
|
5th Pension
|
6th Basic
|
6th Pay
|
6th Pension
|
7 CPC Basic
|
Pension
|
Family Pension
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xplier/Increment
|
Rs 100 pa
|
50%
|
Rs 300 pa
|
50%
|
3%
|
Basic + GP+MSP
|
50%
|
50%
|
30%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rk Pay/ MSP/ Grade Pay
|
200
|
400
|
6100/6000
|
15500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1
|
3000
|
1500
|
10000
|
5000
|
15600
|
27700
|
13850
|
61300
|
38400
|
23000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2
|
3100
|
1550
|
10300
|
5150
|
16260
|
28360
|
14180
|
63100
|
39300
|
23600
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3
|
3200
|
1600
|
10600
|
5300
|
16940
|
29040
|
14520
|
65000
|
40300
|
24200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4
|
3300
|
1650
|
10900
|
5450
|
17640
|
29740
|
14870
|
67000
|
41300
|
24800
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5
|
3400
|
1700
|
11200
|
5600
|
18360
|
30460
|
15230
|
69000
|
42300
|
25400
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6
|
3500
|
1750
|
11500
|
5750
|
19100
|
31200
|
15600
|
71100
|
43300
|
26000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7
|
3600
|
1800
|
11800
|
5900
|
19860
|
31960
|
15980
|
73200
|
44400
|
26600
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8
|
3700
|
1850
|
12100
|
6050
|
20640
|
32740
|
16370
|
75400
|
45500
|
27300
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9
|
3800
|
1900
|
12400
|
6200
|
21450
|
33550
|
16775
|
77700
|
46600
|
28000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10
|
3900
|
1950
|
12700
|
6350
|
22280
|
34380
|
17190
|
80000
|
47800
|
28700
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11
|
4000
|
2000
|
13000
|
6500
|
23140
|
35240
|
17620
|
82400
|
49000
|
29400
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12
|
4100
|
2050
|
13300
|
6650
|
24020
|
36120
|
18060
|
84900
|
50200
|
30100
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13
|
4200
|
2100
|
13600
|
6800
|
24930
|
37030
|
18515
|
87400
|
51500
|
30900
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14
|
4300
|
2150
|
13900
|
6950
|
25870
|
37970
|
18985
|
90000
|
52800
|
31700
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15
|
4400
|
2200
|
14200
|
7100
|
26830
|
38930
|
19465
|
92700
|
54100
|
32500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16
|
4500
|
2250
|
14500
|
7250
|
27820
|
39920
|
19960
|
95500
|
55500
|
33300
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17
|
4600
|
2300
|
14800
|
7400
|
28840
|
40940
|
20470
|
98400
|
57000
|
34200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18
|
4700
|
2350
|
29890
|
41990
|
20995
|
101400
|
58500
|
35100
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19
|
4800
|
2400
|
30970
|
43070
|
21535
|
104400
|
60000
|
36000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20
|
4900
|
2450
|
32090
|
44190
|
22095
|
107500
|
61500
|
36900
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21
|
5000
|
2500
|
110700
|
63100
|
37900
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22
|
5100
|
2550
|
114000
|
64800
|
38900
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23
|
5200
|
2600
|
117400
|
66500
|
39900
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24
|
5300
|
2650
|
120900
|
68200
|
40900
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25
|
124500
|
70000
|
42000
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26
|
128200
|
71900
|
43100
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
27
|
132000
|
73800
|
44300
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
28
|
136000
|
75800
|
45500
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29
|
140100
|
77800
|
46700
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30
|
144300
|
79900
|
47900
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31
|
148600
|
82100
|
49200
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
32
|
153100
|
84300
|
50600
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
33
|
157700
|
86600
|
52000
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34
|
162400
|
89000
|
53400
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
35
|
167300
|
91400
|
54800
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
36
|
172300
|
93900
|
56300
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
37
|
177500
|
96500
|
57900
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
38
|
182800
|
99200
|
59500
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
39
|
188300
|
101900
|
61100
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40
|
193900
|
104700
|
62800
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maj/Lt Cdr/Sqn Ldr
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Component
|
4th Pay +RP
|
4th Pension
|
5th Pay + RP
|
5th Pension
|
6th Basic
|
6th Pay
|
6th Pension
|
7 CPC Basic
|
Pension
|
Family Pension
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xplier/Increment
|
Rs 100 pa
|
50%
|
Rs 300 pa
|
50%
|
3%
|
Basic + GP+MSP
|
50%
|
50%
|
30%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rk Pay/ MSP/ Grade Pay
|
600
|
1200
|
6600/6000
|
15500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1
|
4000
|
2000
|
12800
|
6400
|
15600
|
28200
|
14100
|
69400
|
42500
|
25500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2
|
4100
|
2050
|
13125
|
6563
|
16270
|
28870
|
14435
|
71500
|
43500
|
26100
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3
|
4200
|
2100
|
13450
|
6725
|
16960
|
29560
|
14780
|
73600
|
44600
|
26700
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4
|
4300
|
2150
|
13775
|
6888
|
17670
|
30270
|
15135
|
75800
|
45700
|
27400
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5
|
4400
|
2200
|
14100
|
7050
|
18400
|
31000
|
15500
|
78100
|
46800
|
28100
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6
|
4500
|
2250
|
14425
|
7213
|
19150
|
31750
|
15875
|
80400
|
48000
|
28800
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7
|
4600
|
2300
|
14750
|
7375
|
19930
|
32530
|
16265
|
82800
|
49200
|
29500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8
|
4700
|
2350
|
15075
|
7538
|
20730
|
33330
|
16665
|
85300
|
50400
|
30200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9
|
4800
|
2400
|
15400
|
7700
|
21550
|
34150
|
17075
|
87900
|
51700
|
31000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10
|
4900
|
2450
|
15725
|
7863
|
22400
|
35000
|
17500
|
90500
|
53000
|
31800
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11
|
5000
|
2500
|
16050
|
8025
|
23270
|
35870
|
17935
|
93200
|
54400
|
32600
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12
|
5100
|
2550
|
24170
|
36770
|
18385
|
96000
|
55800
|
33500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13
|
5200
|
2600
|
25100
|
37700
|
18850
|
98900
|
57200
|
34300
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14
|
5300
|
2650
|
26060
|
38660
|
19330
|
101900
|
58700
|
35200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15
|
5400
|
2700
|
27040
|
39640
|
19820
|
105000
|
60300
|
36200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16
|
5500
|
2750
|
28050
|
40650
|
20325
|
108200
|
61900
|
37100
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17
|
5600
|
2800
|
29090
|
41690
|
20845
|
111400
|
63500
|
38100
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18
|
5700
|
2850
|
30170
|
42770
|
21385
|
114700
|
65100
|
39100
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19
|
31280
|
43880
|
21940
|
118100
|
66800
|
40100
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20
|
32420
|
45020
|
22510
|
121600
|
68600
|
41100
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21
|
125200
|
70400
|
42200
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22
|
129000
|
72300
|
43400
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23
|
132900
|
74200
|
44500
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24
|
136900
|
76200
|
45700
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25
|
141000
|
78300
|
47000
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26
|
145200
|
80400
|
48200
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
27
|
149600
|
82600
|
49500
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
28
|
154100
|
84800
|
50900
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29
|
158700
|
87100
|
52300
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30
|
163500
|
89500
|
53700
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31
|
168400
|
92000
|
55200
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
32
|
173500
|
94500
|
56700
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
33
|
178700
|
97100
|
58300
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34
|
184100
|
99800
|
59900
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
35
|
189600
|
102600
|
61500
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
36
|
195300
|
105400
|
63200
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
37
|
201200
|
108400
|
65000
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
38
|
207200
|
111400
|
66800
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lt Col/Cdr/Wg Cdr
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Component
|
4th Pay + RP
|
4th Pension
|
5th Pay + RP
|
5th Pension
|
6th Basic
|
6th Pay
|
6th Pension
|
7 CPC Basic
|
7th Pension
|
Family Pension
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xplier/Increment
|
Rs 100 pa
|
50%
|
Rs 400 pa
|
50%
|
3%
|
Basic + GP+MSP
|
50%
|
50%
|
30%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rk Pay/ MSP/ Grade Pay
|
800
|
1600
|
8000/6000
|
15500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1
|
4700
|
2350
|
15100
|
7550
|
37400
|
51400
|
25700
|
121200
|
68400
|
41000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2
|
4800
|
2400
|
15500
|
7750
|
38770
|
52770
|
26385
|
124800
|
70200
|
42100
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3
|
4900
|
2450
|
15900
|
7950
|
40180
|
54180
|
27090
|
128500
|
72000
|
43200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4
|
5000
|
2500
|
16300
|
8150
|
41630
|
55630
|
27815
|
132400
|
74000
|
44400
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5
|
5100
|
2550
|
16700
|
8350
|
43120
|
57120
|
28560
|
136400
|
76000
|
45600
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6
|
5200
|
2600
|
17100
|
8550
|
44660
|
58660
|
29330
|
140500
|
78000
|
46800
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7
|
5300
|
2650
|
17500
|
8750
|
46240
|
60240
|
30120
|
144700
|
80100
|
48100
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8
|
5400
|
2700
|
17900
|
8950
|
47870
|
61870
|
30935
|
149000
|
82300
|
49400
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9
|
5500
|
2750
|
18300
|
9150
|
49550
|
63550
|
31775
|
153500
|
84500
|
50700
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10
|
5600
|
2800
|
18700
|
9350
|
51280
|
65280
|
32640
|
158100
|
86800
|
52100
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11
|
5700
|
2850
|
53060
|
67060
|
33530
|
162800
|
89200
|
53500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12
|
5800
|
2900
|
54900
|
68900
|
34450
|
167700
|
91600
|
55000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13
|
5900
|
2950
|
56790
|
70790
|
35395
|
172700
|
94100
|
56500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14
|
58740
|
72740
|
36370
|
177900
|
96700
|
58000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15
|
60750
|
74750
|
37375
|
183200
|
99400
|
59600
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16
|
62820
|
76820
|
38410
|
188700
|
102100
|
61300
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17
|
64950
|
78950
|
39475
|
194400
|
105000
|
63000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18
|
67140
|
81140
|
40570
|
200200
|
107900
|
64700
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19
|
206200
|
110900
|
66500
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20
|
212400
|
114000
|
68400
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Col/Capt (IN)/Gp Capt
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Component
|
4th Pay + RP
|
4th Pension
|
5th Pay + RP
|
5th Pension
|
6th Basic
|
6th Pay
|
6th Pension
|
7 CPC Basic
|
7th Pension
|
Family Pension
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xplier/Increment
|
Rs 100 pa
|
50%
|
Rs 400 pa
|
50%
|
3%
|
Basic + GP+MSP
|
50%
|
50%
|
50%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rk Pay/ MSP/ Grade Pay
|
1000
|
2000
|
8700/6000
|
15500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1
|
5500
|
2750
|
17000
|
8500
|
37400
|
52100
|
26050
|
130600
|
73100
|
43800
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2
|
5600
|
2800
|
17450
|
8725
|
38790
|
53490
|
26745
|
134500
|
75000
|
45000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3
|
5700
|
2850
|
17900
|
8950
|
40220
|
54920
|
27460
|
138500
|
77000
|
46200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4
|
5800
|
2900
|
18350
|
9175
|
41690
|
56390
|
28195
|
142700
|
79100
|
47500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5
|
5900
|
2950
|
18800
|
9400
|
43210
|
57910
|
28955
|
147000
|
81300
|
48800
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6
|
6000
|
3000
|
19250
|
9625
|
44770
|
59470
|
29735
|
151400
|
83500
|
50100
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7
|
6100
|
3050
|
19700
|
9850
|
46380
|
61080
|
30540
|
155900
|
85700
|
51400
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8
|
6200
|
3100
|
20150
|
10075
|
48040
|
62740
|
31370
|
160600
|
88100
|
52800
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9
|
6300
|
3150
|
20600
|
10300
|
49750
|
64450
|
32225
|
165400
|
90500
|
54300
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10
|
6400
|
3200
|
21050
|
10525
|
51510
|
66210
|
33105
|
170400
|
93000
|
55800
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11
|
6500
|
3250
|
53320
|
68020
|
34010
|
175500
|
95500
|
57300
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12
|
6600
|
3300
|
55190
|
69890
|
34945
|
180800
|
98200
|
58900
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13
|
6700
|
3350
|
57110
|
71810
|
35905
|
186200
|
100900
|
60500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14
|
59090
|
73790
|
36895
|
191800
|
103700
|
62200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15
|
61130
|
75830
|
37915
|
197600
|
106600
|
63900
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16
|
63230
|
77930
|
38965
|
203500
|
109500
|
65700
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17
|
65390
|
80090
|
40045
|
209600
|
112600
|
67500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18
|
67620
|
82320
|
41160
|
215900
|
115700
|
69400
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brig/Cmde (IN) /Air Cmde
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Component
|
4th Pay + RP
|
4th Pension
|
5th Pay +RP
|
5th Pension
|
6th Basic
|
6th Pay
|
6th Pension
|
7 CPC Basic
|
7th Pension
|
Family Pension
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xplier/Increment
|
Rs 150 pa
|
50%
|
Rs 450 pa
|
50%
|
3%
|
Basic + GP+MSP
|
50%
|
50%
|
30%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rk Pay/ MSP/ Grade Pay
|
1200
|
2400
|
8900/6000
|
15500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1
|
6150
|
3075
|
19100
|
9550
|
37400
|
52300
|
26150
|
139600
|
77600
|
46500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2
|
6300
|
3150
|
19550
|
9775
|
38790
|
53690
|
26845
|
143800
|
79700
|
47800
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3
|
6450
|
3225
|
20000
|
10000
|
40230
|
55130
|
27565
|
148100
|
81800
|
49100
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4
|
6600
|
3300
|
20450
|
10225
|
41710
|
56610
|
28305
|
152500
|
84000
|
50400
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5
|
6750
|
3375
|
20900
|
10450
|
43230
|
58130
|
29065
|
157100
|
86300
|
51800
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6
|
6900
|
3450
|
21350
|
10675
|
44800
|
59700
|
29850
|
161800
|
88700
|
53200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7
|
7050
|
3525
|
21800
|
10900
|
46420
|
61320
|
30660
|
166700
|
91100
|
54700
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8
|
7200
|
3600
|
22250
|
11125
|
48080
|
62980
|
31490
|
171700
|
93600
|
56200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9
|
7350
|
3675
|
22700
|
11350
|
49790
|
64690
|
32345
|
176900
|
96200
|
57700
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10
|
7500
|
3750
|
23150
|
11575
|
51560
|
66460
|
33230
|
182200
|
98900
|
59300
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11
|
7650
|
3825
|
53380
|
68280
|
34140
|
187700
|
101600
|
61000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12
|
7800
|
3900
|
55250
|
70150
|
35075
|
193300
|
104400
|
62600
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13
|
7950
|
3975
|
57180
|
72080
|
36040
|
199100
|
107300
|
64400
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14
|
8100
|
4050
|
59170
|
74070
|
37035
|
205100
|
110300
|
66200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15
|
61220
|
76120
|
38060
|
211300
|
113400
|
68000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16
|
63330
|
78230
|
39115
|
217600
|
116600
|
69900
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17
|
67000
|
81900
|
40950
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maj Gen/R Adm/Air Vice Mshl
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Component
|
4th Pay
|
4th Pension
|
5th Pay
|
5th Pension
|
6th Basic
|
6th Pay
|
6th Pension
|
7 CPC Basic
|
7th Pension
|
Family Pension
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xplier/Increment
|
Rs 200 pa
|
50%
|
Rs 500 pa
|
50%
|
3%
|
Basic + GP+MSP
|
50%
|
50%
|
30%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rk Pay/ MSP/ Grade Pay
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
10000/Nil
|
15500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1
|
5900
|
2950
|
18400
|
9200
|
53000
|
63000
|
31500
|
144200
|
72100
|
43300
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2
|
6100
|
3050
|
18900
|
9450
|
54890
|
64890
|
32445
|
148500
|
74300
|
44600
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3
|
6300
|
3150
|
19400
|
9700
|
56840
|
66840
|
33420
|
153000
|
76500
|
45900
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4
|
6500
|
3250
|
19900
|
9950
|
58850
|
68850
|
34425
|
157600
|
78800
|
47300
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5
|
6700
|
3350
|
20400
|
10200
|
60920
|
70920
|
35460
|
162300
|
81200
|
48700
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6
|
6850
|
3425
|
20900
|
10450
|
63050
|
73050
|
36525
|
167200
|
83600
|
50200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7
|
7000
|
3500
|
21400
|
10700
|
65250
|
75250
|
37625
|
172200
|
86100
|
51700
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8
|
7150
|
3575
|
21900
|
10950
|
67510
|
77510
|
38755
|
177400
|
88700
|
53200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9
|
7300
|
3650
|
22400
|
11200
|
69840
|
79840
|
39920
|
182700
|
91400
|
54800
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10
|
72240
|
82240
|
41120
|
188200
|
94100
|
56500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11
|
74710
|
84710
|
42355
|
193800
|
96900
|
58100
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12
|
77260
|
87260
|
43630
|
199600
|
99800
|
59900
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13
|
79880
|
89880
|
44940
|
205600
|
102800
|
61700
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14
|
82580
|
92580
|
46290
|
211800
|
105900
|
63500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15
|
85360
|
95360
|
47680
|
218200
|
109100
|
65500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lt Gen/V Adm/Air Mshl HAG
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Component
|
4th Pay
|
4th Pension
|
5th Pay
|
5th Pension
|
6th Basic
|
6th Pay
|
6th Pension
|
7 CPC Basic
|
7th Pension
|
Family Pension
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xplier/Increment
|
Rs 100 pa
|
50%
|
Rs 500 pa
|
50%
|
3%
|
Basic + GP+MSP
|
50%
|
50%
|
30%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rk Pay/ MSP/ Grade Pay
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1
|
7300
|
3650
|
22400
|
11200
|
69000
|
69000
|
34500
|
182200
|
91100
|
54700
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2
|
7400
|
3700
|
22950
|
11475
|
71070
|
71070
|
35535
|
187700
|
93900
|
56300
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3
|
7500
|
3750
|
23500
|
11750
|
73210
|
73210
|
36605
|
193300
|
96700
|
58000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4
|
7600
|
3800
|
24050
|
12025
|
75410
|
75410
|
37705
|
199100
|
99600
|
59700
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5
|
7700
|
3850
|
24600
|
12300
|
77680
|
77680
|
38840
|
205100
|
102600
|
61500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6
|
7800
|
3900
|
25150
|
12575
|
80020
|
80020
|
40010
|
211300
|
105700
|
63400
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7
|
7900
|
3950
|
25700
|
12850
|
82430
|
82430
|
41215
|
217600
|
108800
|
65300
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8
|
8000
|
4000
|
26250
|
13125
|
84910
|
84910
|
42455
|
224100
|
112100
|
67200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lt Gen/V Adm/Air Mshl : HAG+
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Component
|
4th Pay
|
4th Pension
|
5th Pay
|
5th Pension
|
6th Basic
|
6th Pay
|
6th Pension
|
7 CPC Basic
|
7th Pension
|
Family Pension
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xplier/Increment
|
3%
|
Basic + GP+MSP
|
50%
|
50%
|
30%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rk Pay/ MSP/ Grade Pay
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1
|
75500
|
75500
|
37750
|
205400
|
102700
|
61600
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2
|
77770
|
77770
|
38885
|
211600
|
105800
|
63500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3
|
80110
|
80110
|
40055
|
217900
|
109000
|
65400
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4
|
82520
|
82520
|
41260
|
224400
|
112200
|
67300
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sir, without first having a rationalization of OROP, any fixation of a "notional pay" under 7CPC, or revision of 7CPC pensions based on the same, has the potential of causing further confusion.
ReplyDeleteUnless the concept of QS is tied in with notional pay, as well as with the concept of migrating older retirees to higher current matrix levels commensurate with their QS, the whole issue of pensions for ESM will remain riddled with anomalies.
I do not think the older Govt letters can address these issues.
Some of the possible anomalies were brought out here https://goo.gl/beqmPS .
Sir,
Delete1. Rationalisation of OROP is available in the 7.11.2015 letter and posts in this blog as disclosed by DESW as to assumptions adopted by O/o CGDA for the calculations.
2. How will you tie the QS to the Notional pay on date of retirement/death? Officers/ORs commissioned/enrolled & attested on the same date may be promoted on different dates. Thereby, having different pay on the dates of retirement/death, though from the same course.
3. As I understand, and use the Excel sheet, with the transition formula from CPC to CPC formula) at the civilian concordance tables indicate that even pre-1986 pensioners have been stepped up to the 7 CPC pay matrix based on pay drawn on 1.1.1986.
4. Are the civilian concordance tables incorrect? Already two amendments have been issued by DOPPW but only for Levels 13, erstwhile GP of Rs 8700, on 18.7.2017 and 14. erstwhile GP Rs 10000, on 13.9.2017 so far.
5. And what happens to those Cols and Brigadiers whose notional pay on date of retirement was Rs 81700/- and 81900/- respectively?
So how would you resolve the anomalies is the subject of the post so that I can learn more, and look at the subject from different points of view.
Sir,
DeleteMy impressions on those issues are as follows:
1. The GOI letter of 2015 merely highlights the manner in which OROP fixation took place which resulted in several anomalies, still awaiting rationalization as per recommendations of OMJC, as your blog post of 02 May 2018 so clearly underlines.
2. Total QS is a check-point in the case of ranks which are currently awarded on a time-bound basis, for ensuring a person who retired with a certain QS in the past, say prior to 2006 in the case of Officers, has parity of pension with a current retiree in a time-bound rank of the same cadre and type of commission with the same QS as the older retiree. I had brought out the likely impact on pensions of retirees with Sqn Ldr and Wg Cdr ranks (and equivalents) here https://goo.gl/sWCpGs .
3. I have seen on other forums and blogs as well that issues for time-bound promotions are clearer to understand and easier to tabulate. These serve to underline how fixations under previous CPCs as well as in OROP miss the underlying principle of "inter temporal parity" which 7CPC itself focused on with great emphasis.
4. In the case of retirees in ranks which are presently selection-based, the notional pay does need to take into account at what stage of the matrix the older retiree would have migrated, based on his QS at promotion, to the level currently fixed for that rank in the matrix and the stage in the matrix fixed for him would then need to reflect his years of service in that rank.
5. As far as differences in pay at retirement between retirees goes, most of the CPCs have always smoothened out these gaps by fixing pensions at the same level for older retirees, albeit by the "lowest in pay-band" principle. After VI CPC, pensions of even those who had served for 20 years were raised to the level of those who had served till super-annuation with much higher QS, by removing the proportional deduction in case of the former, the issue now being that older retirees who had served for longer than 20 years need to be fixed proportionally higher compared to those who retired at 20 years.
6. After OROP the whole paradigm has changed. In the case of civilians and their concordance tables, some of the considerations of differences between levels and stages of older and present pensioners may not apply. So comparisons would be difficult. Some of the inter-connected and cross-linked ideas that reflect on a fairer and more equitable fixation of OROP pensions were tagged by me under OROP
It is very confusing so, let's make it simple. All those officers who has color service more than 33 yrs service be fixed at the max of the index ie at the 20th level and that should be his notional pay and pension. that's 212000 + 15500 = 227500/2 = 113750/- for a Lt Col and accordingly for col and others as it was finally done after OROP.
ReplyDeleteThan what happens to unfortunate people like Major Generals, Lt Generals and Army Cdr equivalents without MSP? It is a settled law that a junior cannot draw more than a senior. Today pension of Army Cdr is Rs 1,25,000!
DeleteSir,
ReplyDeleteAll pre-2006 retirees if given pension for their length of service and rank as per the pay scales/pay matrix laid for each Pay Commission era. It will amount OROP.I will bring out certain examples here about officers retiring in 7th CPC. A Lt Col with 20 years’ service had spent 7 years in Lt Col Rank. He then would be drawing basic pay immediately before retirement as per 7th CPC pay matrix is Rs 144700 + MSP 15500 = Total pay drawn immediately before retirement is 160200, then his pension will be Rs 80100/- and this amount of pension will prevail during entire 7th pay commission because Lt Cols with 20 years’ service retiring in any year (from Jan 2016 to Dec 2025) would be getting same pension of Rs 80100/- unless the pay matrix or MSP is revised with hike.
Similarly, a Lt Col with 25 years’ service would have spent 12 years in Lt Col rank and his last pay drawn immediately before retirement as per 7th CPC Pay Matrix is Rs 167700 + MSP 15500 = Total pay 183200, thus his pension on retirement will be 50% of last pay drawn = 183200*.5= Rs 91600/- This is better than any OROP. This pension for Lt Cols 25 years’ service would prevail for entire 7th CPC era unless there is any revision made by the Govt either in pay matrix or in MSP.
A Lt Col with 30 years’ service would have spent 17 years in Lt Col rank and his last pay drawn immediately before retirement as per 7th CPC Pay Matrix is 194400 plus MSP 15500 = Total pay 209900 and his pension on retirement in any year during 7th CPC will be Rs 104950 (209900*.5).
A Lt Col with 33 years’ service would have spent 20 years in Lt Col rank and his last pay drawn immediately before retirement as per 7th CPC Pay Matrix is 212400 plus MSP 15500 = Total pay 227900 and his pension on retirement any time in 7th CPC era would be Rs 113950 (227900*.5)
Service for above 33 years would be worked out by granting 3% annual increment beyond 33 years since the 33 years’ rule has been scrapped in 6th CPC.
The blunder which Govt has done is granting pension of 26265 per month for aa Lt Cols with 20 years to 38 years qualifying service from 01 Jan 2006 when the 33 years’ rule was scrapped can never be justified in any way.
Implementing pay commission pay matrix in every pay commission for all officers irrespective of date and year of retirement would be much better than OROP. Why should OROP carry annual increment? I will quote a simple example. There are two Lt Cols with 20 years of service. One retires at 20 years and the other one continues in service. The person retires after 20 years he would always get pension for 20 years’ service only and the officer who continued in service may serve for 33 years and he gets pension for 33 years’ service. This clearly indicates that the active service grants increments for every year whereas a retiree getting pension for fixed number of years would keep getting pension for life time for the fixed years of service he had.
Sir, there may be no Lt Col with 33 years service and 20 years in the rank because AVSC promotes him in 13th year and his superannuation is 52 years? Or am I wrong?
DeleteWould notional pay dependent pension put to rest the OROP as you have stated in your last paragraph? Then what happens to OROP?
Sir,
DeleteAs per Pension Regulations 2008, pension is based on length of qualifying service. I do have 38 yrs of qualifying service as Lt Col. There are Lt Col who retired with 30 to 33 yrs service. Officers from ranks like me would be having qualifying service up to 40 yrs. 100% rank service is counted towards ICO's pension by the govt.
If we see pay matrix of 7th cpc, the pay given therein plus MSP would be much higher than what we are being paid as pension in the name of OROP. If an officer retiring in 7th cpc with certain length of service he will be getting pay as per 7th cpc pay matrix only and when he retires he gets 50% of the pay given in pay matrix then why don't we get same pension having same rank and same length of service. What I submit is that the OROP should be same and matching with the pay matrix of the 7th cpc during 7th cpc era. OROP scales should not be drawn separately but the pay matrix of the serving officers would be implemented for past retirees and they should be given 50% of the pay in pay matrix plus 50% of MSP as pension which the officers retiring during 7th cpc are getting. If you see our OROP table, out of 66 cells only 36 cells do carry increments in the service bracket up to 33 years then what about rest of the cells. Such pay fixation is not there in pay matrix.
Comparison between OROP scales and 50% of pay given in 7th cpc pay matrix would clearly bring out as to what I am trying to say.
Regards
The Expert Committee, of which Maj Navdeep Singh was a member, has this to state in its observations and recommendations with respect to Pension Regulations 2008: -
Delete2.4.8. Suspect legality of Pension Regulations, 2008 and Entitlement Rules 2010: The above Regulations have been issued without due process and without concurrence of the Deptt of Pensions & Pensioners Welfare as required under the Rules of Business. When we raised the question about the legality of the Pension Regulations, it was intimated to us by representatives of DESW that as also informed to the top echelons of DESW the new Pension Regulations 2008 were merely a collection of latest policies issued from time to time and made no substantive or material changes to Pension Regulations 1961 or to existing Government instructions. This contention is incorrect and we have pointed out in detail how these Regulations are not legal and how material and substantive changes have been made through the backdoor and the higher echelons of the DESW as well as the then Raksha Mantri were kept in the dark about the process. We have observed that the so-called Pension Regulations 2008 or the Entitlement Rules 2010 have no sanctity of law as far as alteration of entitlements is concerned. The same can at best be adopted to regulate procedural aspects and if there is a conflict between the same and the actual Pension Regulations 1961 or Entitlement Rules 1982 thereby affecting the rights of pensioners negatively then the Regulations of 1961 and Entitlement Rules 1982 shall prevail to determine the entitlement
My understanding is that pension would be 50% of the notional pay + RP +increments in 4 CPC; multiplied by 40% + RP + increments in 5 CPC'; multiplied by 1.84 +increments + MSP in 6 CPC and fixed in the 7CPC matrix + MSP.
DeleteSir, The tables are a great help. I will totally side-step logic or accuracy of the calculations but strive to illustrate my previous comment about QS and its relevance.
DeleteIf you could consider incorporating a column for QS, alongside the respective increment column, under each successive CPC section of your table for, say Wg Cdr and equivalent, you'd be able to view at a glance how pensions of older retirees could get pegged at levels corresponding to those applying to current retirees with much less QS.
That would be contrary to all concepts and principles underlying OROP and the much emphasised "inter temporal equity".
Sir,
DeleteThe column on extreme left in each table indicates the service in the rank.
Secondly, permit me to provide some details as I was posted in Air HQ (P Staff) in 1977.
Till 1977 (when the Deep Selection policy was approved), promotions of Sqn Ldrs/Wg Cdrs/Gp Capts of a particular branch to the next higher rank happened whenever a vacancy arose. Every Sqn Ldr/Wg Cdr/Gp Capt of the particular course was considered and, if found fit, was approved for promotion. There wasn't a Select List or a Reserve List. However, the officer was promoted to the appropriate next higher rank when the vacancy of arose or continued to be a Sqn Ldr/Wg Cdr/Air Cmde till he superannuated. It was not strange to see Air HQ (P Staff) sending out letters in which Para 1 congratulated the officer on being selected for promotion and Para 2 regretted that he could not be promoted because of lack of a vacancy. The officer might have waited anywhere between 1 and 5 years before he was promoted or superannuated.
When the Deep Selection Policy was introduced, all officers of a particular course were considered in the year and depending on the vacancies, and merit, placed in the Select Main List (SML) and Select Reserve List (SRL). Officers in the SML were promoted by Service number whereas, if an officer in the SML was medically unfit or on deputation, his seniority was protected, and the officer(s) in the SRL was promoted by or before 31 Mar of the succeeding year. The seniority list was rearranged on 31 Mar of the succeeding year.
Those placed in the SRL but not promoted and those not promoted went into the consideration zone for the second Board and were joined by a fresh course in the next year. And the process continued.
In 2005, every Wg Cdr who was not promoted either in the SML or SRL was promoted to the rank after AVSC but their seniority was not rearranged vis-a-vis those from their own course promoted in the SML or SRL before 2005 i.e. their Reckonable Emoluments (Notional Pay) differed.
Therefore, the QS anomaly arises because those commissioned on the same date but promoted on different dates and/or years, consequently, will have different Reckonable Emoluments (notional pay).
The above aspects of promotion time frames (which differed between branches) and between Army, Navy and Air Force, and representations by many Armed Forces officers with higher residency in a rank as reflected in the briefing prepared for MPs of the Lok Sabha and available in the public domain, may probably have been the conundrum faced which has led to protection of pension above the average pension for a particular rank and years of service.
Please incorporate a column for QS under each successive CPC, given the above mentioned for me to understand as an example.
Sir, the situation relating to promotion policies of the past, so clearly explained by you, made for some truly scintillating reading and brought back vivid memories of the era when some features of deep selection were first touched on by our RO, to me and others in an assembly of officers of the unit. The whole issue lay in the distant future then for the likes of me who were just starting our careers at the time. Little did I know how the matter would take on so much importance in decades to follow.
DeleteIt also underlines the complexity involved in basing any current pension fixation on residency in a particular rank for older retirees.
But based on how past CPCs have smoothened out issues arising from differences in promotion policies and also on the underlying concepts of OROP, it becomes clear there has to be parity between pensions of older and current Officer retirees based on their QS, branch as well as type of commission (eg Parity of current and older retirees with Branch Commissions may have to be considered separately from older and current retirees with PCs due to differences in policies relating to time-bound promotions).
I have mentioned this previously as well, there is a clear cut basis of pension parity in the case of ranks which are currently given on time-bound basis. This involves taking the QS of older retirees into account and not just the number of increments earned or period of residency in a rank. And, taking a step further, it also requires a parity based on a notional progression of older retirees to the next higher level in the matrix if their QS so warrants (eg Level 12-A instead of Level 11 for older PC Sqn Ldr retirees with service more than 20 years).
The issue is less clear for those retirees who were cleared for promotion in the pre deep-selection era but were not given the promotion. Parities, based on QS as a check-point in notional fixation, may undo some of that damage.
As mentioned by you, the QS for current retirees can be seen related to matrix stages for Wg Cdr of older and present retirees in this blog-post. The corresponding V CPC QS could be considered as 18 years. Even those who picked up their ranks in subsequent boards at QS of 19 and 20 years or the time-scale rank at QS of 21 years would lose out as compared to current retirees. https://goo.gl/qkBBj3
There is a further example here https://goo.gl/Q51bqg
But you have not taken into effect that there were some set stages till the maxim of the pay for each rank was reached.
DeleteThen, in the Air Force, the F Branch Sqn to Wg Cdr was considered in the 16th year and the Ground Duties in the 18th but the integrated pay scale in the 4 CPC assumed that Maj to Lt Col would be in the 17th year.
Even in F Branch the ratio was 9 fighter pilots: 7 transport/helicopter pilots:3 Navigators commissioned in the same year!
Similarly in AE Branches and between Adm/Lgs/Accts etc
And would not elevating one from say Level 12 to 13 irrespective of rank be a promotion and would Level 13 by merit officers agree?
The Army's Command and Exit policy has Zero year for Arms, Zero plus one year for Combat Support and Zero plus 2 years for Services - all from the same course!
Sir, As the past CPCs have demonstrated, these branch-wise differences are harmonized in tables for older, pre-CPC pensioners. Previously, the problem was pensions of older pensioners were fixed at minimum of pay in pay-band but there were no branch-wise differences other than the standard differentiation between Commissioned Officers of AMC/ADC/RVC/TA/MNS having their separate tables and all the rest having a separate common table based on QS.
DeleteEven if we consider the earlier starting point, that applied before AVSC implementation, of 16 years of QS for, say, Wg Cdrs of the Flying Branch, we find Flying Branch Wg Cdr retirees of the pre Dec 2004 era would still lose out in terms of pension vis-à-vis current retirees of the same branch in the same rank with equal QS. That is why, I had mentioned in my blog-post that readers would need to compare their own QS and pension with that of current retirees as given in the table here goo.gl/qkBBj3.
Now, the issue connected with time-bound ranks is a lot simpler. If an officer with a PC retired with, say 28 years of service as Wg Cdr or Wg Cdr(TS) in 2001, his notional pay based on just increments that he had earned might come to the pay of a current Wing Commander with far less service than him. This would defeat the very logic of OROP or "Inter Temporal Equity".
Also that 2001 Wg Cdr pensioner needs to have pension parity with a current Gp Capt(TS) pensioner with equal service ie 28 years. This is in line with the recent judgements and decisions that provide for Lt Col pensions to older Maj retirees with 21 years of service, albeit on different grounds. Giving pension parity with a higher time-bound rank would not amount to giving a post-retirement promotion to the earlier retiree. The "merit" aspect does not affect this matter as these are time-bound current-promotions and the notional progression of pensions for older pensioners for time bound ranks would need to follow a downward and sideways path for ensuring "Inter Temporal Equity" and "Equal Remuneration For Equal Work". The pension progression for correct parity can best be stated as in the table linked to in this post goo.gl/ykFh8o
Another important thing to consider is that there would not be much of an issue in applying an increment based notional-pay approach to retirees of VI CPC regime. The increments and grade-pay and pay-bands correspond closely to the levels and stages of VII CPC Matrix. There would not be much of an issue for such retirees in terms of QS based pension parity. It is the earlier retirees who would be affected.
Sir, as a further clarification in respect of your observations, the following needs to be considered:
Delete*"..not taken into effect that there were some set stages till the maxim of the pay for each rank was reached" : The tables in my blogposts https://goo.gl/qkBBj3 and https://goo.gl/Q51bqg relate to whatever stage an older retiree had retired at and the corresponding QS and increment stage in the 7CPC Matrix of a current retiree in a timebound rank, there being no "set stages" in the current matrix.
*"...Army's Command and Exit policy...": That would not affect the comparison being made on the increments actually earned by a V CPC regime retiree with a specific QS and the corresponding QS of a current retiree with the same number of increment stages in the Matrix.
Is there a legal precedent by which you are moving Wg Cdr/officer to the next higher level after retirement?
DeleteSir, no one gets "moved" to the next higher level. The stage in the next higher level indicates where pension parity needs to lie for older and current retirees with the same QS and type of commission in ranks which are presently given on time-bound ie QS basis.
DeleteAs I had mentioned previously, some of the older Sqn Ldr retirees did get pension parity with Wg Cdrs of equal service after the former had retired. They were not "moved" to a higher rank. Though, of course, that was in a different context. But it does establish that giving pension parity to a lower time-bound rank pensioner vis-a-vis a higher time-bound rank pensioner on a principled set of criteria is possible.
To put it another way, the legal precedence of an Officer who retired as Sqn Ldr with 20 years of service in the past getting less pension than a Wg Cdr (now on time-bound basis) retiree in Dec 2004 is what needs to be questioned.
The tables and notional progress to higher levels merely serve to illustrate the logic that service rendered for x years with one type of commission has to have some bearing on the matter when we are considering parity of pensions of time-bound ranks, old and current, keeping the QS of currently retiring Officers.
From a plain reading of the ratio in the Nakara and Vains cases, a senior officer must NOT be paid less pension than a junior, and amongst a class/rank there cannot be two different rates of pension based on an arbitrary date of cut off.
DeleteHow does one extend that logic to Sqn Ldrs with 20 years of service being paid same pension as Wg Cdrs retiring with 20 years after 16.12.2004?
Further, OROP does provide the same pension for the same rank for the same number of years of service. Neither the AVSC nor the JSM 2015 has extended that benefit which per se is it your argument that junior officers of yore with 20 or more years of service must be paid what officers with similar amount of service are paid, rank nothwitstanding? Then what happens to Gp Capts and Air Cmdes, AVMs and Air Mshls of yore?
Sir, no officer retiree (Sqn Ldr or Wg Cdr) would be paid more than a retiree in a higher rank if pension parities are implemented at QS of 20 and 26 years respectively.
DeleteBut if we consider the matrix, a current Wg Cdr at stage 10 in level 12A would have a pay of 152200 and a Gp capt at stage 6 in Level 13 would have a lower pay of 145700. So how will the yardstick of higher pension for the higher rank apply in these two cases where no pension parity with the next higher level is even being considered?
The judgement in the case of D. S. Nakara And Others Vs Union Of India, I presume you have referred to Writ Petitions Nos. 5939-5941 of 1980, was in a different context. But it is full of references to arbitrariness of cut-off dates and homogeneous classes which most directly apply when time-bound ranks are to be considered.
As for the reference to the case of Maj Gen SPS Vains and erstwhile retirees in Gp Capt and higher ranks, these all apply to select ranks and have no co-relation with retirees in time-bound ranks. Select rank retirees would not be affected to any parities introduced for time-bound ranks.
Even now there are pensioners in Gp Capt(TS) ranks. If at all they draw more pension than select Gp Capt retirees with less QS, then that forms a legal precedence. But in no case could Air ranks be affected by this concept of QS based parity.
Thank you. Best Wishes
Delete