IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
INHERENT JURISDICTION
CURATIVE PETITION (C) NO. 126 OF 2014
IN
REVIEW PETITION (C) NO. 2492 OF 2013
IN
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 23055 OF 2013
UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER PETITIONER(s)
VERSUS
CENTRAL GOVT. SAG (S-29) AND ANOTHER RESPONDENT(s)
O R D E R
Application for oral hearing is rejected.
We have gone through the curative petition and the relevant documents. In our opinion, no case is made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra Vs. Ashok Hurra & Anr., reported in 2002 (4) SCC 388. Hence, the Curative Petition is dismissed.
..............................CJI.
(R.M. LODHA)
................................J.
(H.L. DATTU)
................................J.
(DR. B.S. CHAUHAN)
................................J.
(SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR)
NEW DELHI; .................................J.
APRIL 30, 2014. (FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA)
CURATIVE PETITION SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
CURATIVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 126 OF 2014
IN
REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 2492 OF 2013
IN
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 23055 OF 2013
UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
CENTRAL GOVT. SAG (S-29) AND ANOTHER Respondent(s)
(appln. for oral hearing and office report)
Date: 30/04/2014 This Petition was circulated today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
By Circulation
UPON perusing papers the Court made the following
O R D E R
Curative Petition is dismissed in terms of signed order.
(Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan)
AR-cum-PS Court Master
[SIGNED ORDER IS PLACED ON THE FILE]
INHERENT JURISDICTION
CURATIVE PETITION (C) NO. 126 OF 2014
IN
REVIEW PETITION (C) NO. 2492 OF 2013
IN
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 23055 OF 2013
UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER PETITIONER(s)
VERSUS
CENTRAL GOVT. SAG (S-29) AND ANOTHER RESPONDENT(s)
O R D E R
Application for oral hearing is rejected.
We have gone through the curative petition and the relevant documents. In our opinion, no case is made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra Vs. Ashok Hurra & Anr., reported in 2002 (4) SCC 388. Hence, the Curative Petition is dismissed.
..............................CJI.
(R.M. LODHA)
................................J.
(H.L. DATTU)
................................J.
(DR. B.S. CHAUHAN)
................................J.
(SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR)
NEW DELHI; .................................J.
APRIL 30, 2014. (FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA)
CURATIVE PETITION SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
CURATIVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 126 OF 2014
IN
REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 2492 OF 2013
IN
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 23055 OF 2013
UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
CENTRAL GOVT. SAG (S-29) AND ANOTHER Respondent(s)
(appln. for oral hearing and office report)
Date: 30/04/2014 This Petition was circulated today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
By Circulation
UPON perusing papers the Court made the following
O R D E R
Curative Petition is dismissed in terms of signed order.
(Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan)
AR-cum-PS Court Master
[SIGNED ORDER IS PLACED ON THE FILE]
No comments:
Post a Comment