Please also refer to tables in the PCDA (P) Circulars No. 501 & 502 and
notes therein which are reproduced below for ready reference: -
1. The qualifying service shown in Col No. 1
is actual qualifying service (i.e. the actual QS for which pension has been
sanctioned), the amount of revised pension indicated against is inclusive of
rank weightage.
2. Any
rank granted ACP-I will be eligible for pension of next higher rank & ACP-II will be eligible for further next
higher rank of ACP-I.
3. Where revised pension for junior rank is
higher than senior rank for the same group and qualifying service, pension of
senior rank has been stepped up to the level of the pension for junior rank.
4. The rates of pension above terms of
engagement are in respect of those who were retained in service compulsorily
beyond their engagements during emergency period.
Naik/Leading Seaman/Corporal
Pre-06 retirees
|
|
QS
|
Pay in PB
|
Grade
Pay
|
MSP
|
Incre
|
Total
|
Pension
|
Modified
Parity
|
|
1.1.2006
|
6
|
7490
|
2400
|
2000
|
300
|
11890
|
5945
|
3200
|
|
1.1.2007
|
7
|
7790
|
310
|
12190
|
6095
|
3399
|
||
|
1.1.2008
|
8
|
8100
|
320
|
12500
|
6250
|
3599
|
||
|
1.1.2009
|
9
|
8420
|
330
|
12820
|
6410
|
3799
|
||
|
1.1.2010
|
10
|
8750
|
340
|
13150
|
6575
|
3999
|
||
|
1.1.2011
|
11
|
9090
|
350
|
13490
|
6745
|
4199
|
||
|
1.1.2012
|
12
|
9440
|
360
|
13840
|
6920
|
4399
|
||
|
1.1.2013
|
13
|
9800
|
370
|
14200
|
7100
|
4599
|
||
|
1.1.2014
|
14
|
10170
|
380
|
14570
|
7285
|
4799
|
||
|
1.1.2015
|
15
|
10550
|
390
|
14950
|
7475
|
4999
|
||
|
1.1.2016
|
16
|
10940
|
400
|
15340
|
7670
|
5199
|
||
|
1.1.2017
|
17
|
11340
|
420'
|
15740
|
7870
|
5399
|
||
|
1.1.2018
|
18
|
11760
|
430
|
16160
|
8080
|
5599'
|
||
|
1.1.2019
|
19
|
12190
|
440
|
16590
|
8295
|
5799
|
||
|
1.1.2o20
|
20
|
126301
|
450
|
17030
|
8515
|
5999
|
||
|
1.1.2021
|
21
|
13080
|
470
|
17480
|
8740
|
6199
|
||
|
1.1.2022
|
22
|
13550
|
480
|
17950
|
8975
|
6599
|
Post 1.1.2006
|
|
QS
|
Pay in PB
|
Grade
Pay
|
MSP
|
Incre
|
Total
|
Pension
|
Modified
Parity
|
|
1-Jan-11
|
6
|
7650
|
2400
|
2000
|
290
|
11650
|
5825
|
3200
|
|
1-Jan-12
|
7
|
7940
|
300
|
11940
|
5970
|
3399
|
||
|
1-Jan-13
|
8
|
8240
|
310
|
12240
|
6120
|
3599
|
||
|
1-Jan-14
|
9
|
8550
|
320
|
12550
|
6275
|
3799
|
||
|
1-Jan-15
|
10
|
8870
|
330
|
12870
|
6435
|
3999
|
||
|
1-Jan-16
|
11
|
9200
|
340
|
13200
|
6600
|
4199
|
||
|
1-Jan-17
|
12
|
9540
|
350
|
13540
|
6770
|
4399
|
||
|
1-Jan-18
|
13
|
9890
|
360
|
13890
|
6945
|
4599
|
||
|
1-Jan-19
|
14
|
10250
|
370
|
14250
|
7125
|
4799
|
||
|
1-Jan-20
|
15
|
10620
|
380
|
14620
|
7310
|
4999
|
||
|
1-Jan-21
|
16
|
11000
|
390
|
15000
|
7500
|
5199
|
||
|
1-Jan-22
|
17
|
11390
|
410
|
15390
|
7695
|
5399
|
||
|
1-Jan-23
|
18
|
11800
|
420
|
15800
|
7900
|
5599
|
||
|
1-Jan-24
|
19
|
12220
|
430
|
16220
|
8110
|
5799
|
||
|
1-Jan-25
|
20
|
12650
|
440
|
16650
|
8325
|
5999
|
||
|
1-Jan-26
|
21
|
13090
|
460
|
17090
|
8545
|
6199
|
||
|
1-Jan-27
|
22
|
13550
|
470
|
17550
|
8775
|
6599
|
Havildar/Petty Officer/Sergeant
|
|
QS
|
Pay in PB
|
Grade
Pay
|
MSP
|
Incre
|
Total
|
Pension
|
Modified
Parity
|
|
1.1.2006
|
14
|
8040
|
2800
|
2000
|
330
|
12840
|
6420
|
5203
|
|
1.1.2007
|
15
|
8370
|
340
|
13170
|
6585
|
5440
|
||
|
1.1.2008
|
16
|
8710
|
350
|
13510
|
6755
|
5676
|
||
|
1.1.2009
|
17
|
9060
|
360
|
13860
|
6930
|
5913
|
||
|
1.1.2010
|
18
|
9420
|
370
|
14220
|
7110
|
6149
|
||
|
1.1.2011
|
19
|
9790
|
380
|
14590
|
7295
|
6386
|
||
|
1.1.2012
|
20
|
10170
|
390
|
14970
|
7485
|
6622
|
||
|
1.1.2013
|
21
|
10560
|
400
|
15360
|
7680
|
6859
|
||
|
1.1.2014
|
22
|
10960
|
420
|
15760
|
788-
|
6859
|
||
|
1.1.2015
|
23
|
11380
|
430
|
16180
|
8090
|
7332
|
||
|
1.1.2016
|
24
|
11810
|
440
|
16610
|
8305
|
7568
|
||
|
1.1.2017
|
25
|
12250
|
460
|
17050
|
8525
|
7568
|
||
|
1.1.2018
|
26
|
12710
|
470
|
17510
|
8755
|
7568
|
||
|
1.1.2019
|
27
|
13180
|
480
|
17980
|
8990
|
7568
|
||
|
1.1.2020
|
28
|
13660
|
500
|
18460
|
9230
|
7568
|
|
|
QS
|
Pay in PB
|
Grade
Pay
|
MSP
|
Incre
|
Total
|
Pension
|
Modified
Parity
|
|
1.1.2011
|
14
|
9040
|
2800
|
2000
|
360
|
13480
|
6920
|
5203
|
|
1.1.2015
|
15
|
9400
|
370
|
14200
|
7100
|
5440
|
||
|
1.1.2016
|
16
|
9770
|
380
|
14570
|
7285
|
5676
|
||
|
1.1.2017
|
17
|
10150
|
390
|
14950
|
7475
|
5913
|
||
|
1.1.2018
|
18
|
10540
|
400
|
15340
|
7670
|
6149
|
||
|
1.1.2019
|
19
|
10940
|
420
|
15740
|
7870
|
6386
|
||
|
1.1.2020
|
20
|
11360
|
430
|
16160
|
8080
|
6622
|
||
|
1.1.2021
|
21
|
11790
|
440
|
16590
|
8295
|
6859
|
||
|
1.1.2022
|
22
|
12230
|
450
|
17030
|
8515
|
7095
|
||
|
1.1.2023
|
23
|
12680
|
470
|
17480
|
8740
|
7332
|
||
|
1.1.2024
|
24
|
13150
|
480
|
17950
|
8975
|
7568
|
||
|
1.1.2025
|
25
|
13630
|
500
|
18430
|
9215
|
7568
|
||
|
1.1.2026
|
26
|
14130
|
510
|
18930
|
9465
|
7568
|
||
|
1.1.2017
|
27
|
14640
|
530
|
19440
|
9720
|
7568
|
||
|
1.1.2018
|
28
|
15170
|
540
|
19970
|
9985
|
7568
|
Notes:
- In the case of Sgt & equivalents, the current retirees are drawing higher
last pay drawn, consequently higher pension than the top of the scale based
pension.
However,
the senior in the upper table will get higher pay and pension than all juniors
who are promoted to this rank at a later date.
Thus,
once pay is re-set on a date, say 01 Apr 2014, then there will not be any
change in pension of this rank till the next pay commission
VRS means that a person is given a financial package as a means to encourage him/her to leave the job. In services you do not get a paisa more if you are leaving early i.e. after completing terms of engagement.You just get proportionate share of your gratuity (all other benefits like insurance, provident fund and leave are your own savings). On the contrary you get less pension as you are leaving when your salary is low. Most persons leave because they have pressing family issues to take care, have disability/health issues, have no promotion prospects in service, have been overlooked for promotion or are simply tired of 24X7 commitments in stations where they can not look after their familes. In army at least I have seen a minuscule percentage leaving early because they have employment outside. This exit route also keeps the services young. Earlier we had a clause that those going on voluntary retirement were not being given disability benefits. This clause (if true) in the OROP will be a retrograde step. Hope wiser sense prevails (but then wiser sense is a very rare commodity when the egos of politicians and bureaucrats are involved). Mr Jaitley and team has achieved what Pak could not do in decades. Jai Hind.
ReplyDeleteSir,
ReplyDeletePlease refer to the statement made in press conference on 05 Sep 15 the defence min has declared OROP and said that they will be spending approximately 10 to 12 thousand crores in implementing OROP. Can we ask for the calculations made by the Defence ministry for reaching the figure of 10,000 crores to 12,000 crores? I am asking this as i donot know exactly what can be asked in RTI.
Regards
Sir, As now the pensions under OROP have been defined as pensions "paid" in base year, some of the pensions listed in these tables may be used as part of the calculation for averaging OROP pensions thus severely limiting the increase in OROP for any category of pre 2006 pensioner. Your views could dispel a lot of uncertainty. https://goo.gl/819RVg
ReplyDeletePlease read the next post.
Deletesunlit sir..as per your comment "some of the pensions listed in these tables may be used as part of the calculation for averaging OROP pensions"
Deleteyour point is not clear if u pl elaborate it ...
@JUSTIN: The statement by Hon'ble RM and its implications have been discussed in my blog post linked to in my previous comment.
Delete@Justin, your comment was edited because allegations are as repugnant as baseless allegations. You may wish to confirm how the pay transition was carried out from 5th to 6th CPC in MoD No. 17 (4)/2008(2)/D (Pen/Policy) dated 12.11.2008 and find out the truth.
ReplyDeleteRespected sir..... with reference to your comment i present my views as..
Delete1) as far as your blog activity and image is considered your presentations are very useful and befitting your blog slogan" Being Informed is the Best Weapon." and u r a very highly respected person.
2). i will not engage my self in any point scoring tactics and offer my apology if it has belittle your blog's image...
3) in the context of the blog post the edited comment points REPRESENTED were w.r.t. or only..
4) being myself a x sgt i feel hurt (and it is the general feeling among same placed sgts)at downgrading of status bcz of placed in pb-1,the basic 6 cpc pension r short fixed as and when the pensions r revised due consideration was not given to rank structure and again the .recent pre-2006 cir issued by mod for re fixation pensions of OR the cgda has taken wrong weightages there by wrongly MGP r fixed...
with rgds...
Sir, please file a RTI requesting CGDA to provide information on the methodology and parameters utilised to prepare the tables that are causing anguish. A reply will have to be provided within 30 days and that would either set to rest your doubts or give cause for CGDA to take a second look at their work.
DeleteAs Sgts for being placed in Pay Band 1, the next pay commission's recommendations are almost on us let us see if any improvement will be made.
@Justin, while you are at it you may also wish to read Para 2 and 3 of MoD ID No. 1(13)/2012/D (Pen/Policy) dated 17.1.2013.
ReplyDeleteSir please recall the statement made by the FM that ORs need to be paid higher pension,I feel that govt may grant them a higher % of pension on Last Drawn Pay.
ReplyDelete